<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

    <title>Fenwick &#38; West - Publications</title>
    <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/rss/Default.asp"/>
    <updated>2010-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
    <id>http://www.fenwick.com/rss/Default.asp</id>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: The FTC Pursues Online Endorsements by Undisclosed Insiders </title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-02-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-02-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Federal Trade Commission recently signaled that it may begin cracking down on the increasingly common practice of pumping up a product with online reviews that purport to be from customers but are really posted by friends, family or employees of the vendor</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent/Antitrust Litigation Alert: Federal Circuit Limits Patent Misuse in Princo</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Patent_Antitrust_Alert_09-02-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Patent_Antitrust_Alert_09-02-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A sharply divided en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit significantly narrowed the scope of the patent misuse defense this week</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Litigation Alert: The Federal Circuit Rejects Attempt to Narrow Standing Requirements For False Patent Marking Claims under 35 U.S. C. &#167; 292</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-01-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-01-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Yesterday, the Federal Circuit rejected a procedural attempt to stem the recent flood of &#8220;false patent marking&#8221; lawsuits.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Everything Must End Eventually: The Fifth Circuit Buries Leegin, Epic Vertical Price Fixing Case is Over</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_08-18-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_08-18-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In its second encounter with PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on August 17, 2010 affirmed the dismissal on the pleadings of the plaintiff&#8217;s antitrust claims for vertical minimum price fixing</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 11, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=61&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_081110"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=61&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_081110</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-08-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-08-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>It is often difficult to get a court to dismiss an employment discrimination case prior to trial due to the number of critical facts involved that generally require resolution by a jury, including the employer'stivating reasons for the adverse employment action.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing In Silicon Valley (Second Quarter 2010)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=14"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=14</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-08-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-08-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 126 companies headquartered in Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2010.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A unanimous decision is not always what it seems. On June 28, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld without dissent the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit&#8217;s ruling that a patent application for hedging against price changes was not patentable.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Update - FCPA Update: Implementation of U.K. Bribery Bill Postponed Until April 2011</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_07-27-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_07-27-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Implementation of the U.K. Bribery Bill has been postponed for nine months while the government evaluates comments to the Bill raised by various business constituencies</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Ninth Circuit Reverses Broad Injunction Against Doll Manufacturer on the Basis of Employment Contract Interpretation and Thin Copyright</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-23-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-23-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Mattel v. MGA Entertainment, issued yesterday by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, provides important lessons for drafting and interpreting employment and invention assignment agreements, clarifies the legal standards for...

</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Emerging Growth Services</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/EGS_Overview.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/EGS_Overview.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>For clients and investors within our network, we provide access to our CTO and IT organization for technical diligence services.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: The Dodd-Frank Act: Provisions Affecting Corporate Governance And Executive Compensation Disclosures For All Public Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-21-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-21-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 21, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.  This legislation is primarily focused on bank reform &#8212; regulation and resolution of financial companies that pose systemic risk, banking regulatory reform, regulation of derivatives, and consumer financial protection.  </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Strategy for Personalized Medicine in Light of Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/07-19-10_Patent_Strategy_for_Personalized_Medicine_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/07-19-10_Patent_Strategy_for_Personalized_Medicine_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Advanced medical diagnostics, such as those that use information derived from multiple genetic variations or biomarker expression levels, certainly fall within the scope of patentable subject matter, according to the guidance provided by the Bilski decision. Significant investment is required to develop and market complex personalized medicine diagnostics that prognose risk or outcome based on a number of genetic or biological markers. Such methods do not preempt any basic law of nature because alternative predictive models can be developed using different sets of markers. Consequently, they should not be subject to &#167; 101 rejections under current law.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 14, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=60&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_071410"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=60&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_071410</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In an unpublished decision, a California appellate court revived a plaintiff's claim for age discrimination, finding admissible his proffered &quot;me too&quot; evidence of a corporate plan to drive out older managers</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: The Trump Card in the GRId Game</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_07-13-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_07-13-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>RMG's New Rating Process - GRId.  RiskMetrics Group, Inc. (&quot;RMG&quot;) recently released a new corporate governance rating system, Governance Risk Indicators (&quot;GRId&quot;), which replaced RMG's Corporate Governance Quotient system (&quot;CGQ&quot;)</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: New Act Would Require Public Company Executive Compensation Disclosures and Corporate Governance Changes</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_07-06-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_07-06-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 25, 2010, the House-Senate Conference Committee released the text of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the &quot;Act&quot;). </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (2009 Annual Survey)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Annual_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Annual_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in 2009. Our survey does not include financing rounds of less than US $500,000. The tables below also show, for purposes of comparison, the results of our previously released surveys.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Alert: Supreme Court Unanimously Rejects Bilski Patent Application but Narrowly Upholds Business Method Patents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_06-28-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_06-28-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Bilski case presented the Supreme Court with an opportunity to eliminate business methods from the scope of patentable subject matter</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Viacom v. YouTube/Google: Judge Swats Billion-Dollar Copyright Lawsuit; Viacom to Appeal Summary Judgment Ruling</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_06-24-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_06-24-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A federal district court granted summary judgment to YouTube and Google yesterday, holding that a safe harbor of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) protected the video-upload giants against billion-dollar claims brought by Viacom International and other content holders.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employment Practice Group Alert: Supreme Court Rules That Employer Search Of Employee Text Messages Did Not Violate Fourth Amendment</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EA_06-18-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EA_06-18-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In City of Ontario v. Quon, the United States Supreme Court held that a government employer's review of an employee's text messages sent and received on an employer-issued pager did not violate the employee's Fourth Amendment constitutional rights.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Update: SEC v. Jenkins: SOX 304 Clawback Requires Innocent CEOs and CFOs to Return Incentive-Based Compensation if the Company Restates Its Financials Due to &quot;Misconduct&quot;</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_06-16-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_06-16-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Securities Litigation Update: SEC v. Jenkins: SOX 304 Clawback Requires Innocent CEOs and CFOs to Return Incentive-Based Compensation if the Company Restates Its Financials Due to &quot;Misconduct&quot;</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Litigation Alert: Decision in Pequignot v. Solo Cup Company Provides Guidance for False Patent Marking Liability</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-11-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-11-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Yesterday the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Pequignot v. Solo Cup Company, No. 2009-1547 (Fed. Cir. Jun. 10, 2010), providing some much needed guidance on avoiding liability under the &#8220;false marking&#8221; statute, 35 U.S.C. &#167; 292.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Federal Copyright Law Preempts State Law Breach of Confidence and Implied Contract Claims for Unauthorized Use of Works</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-10-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-10-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 3, 2010, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that federal copyright law preempts common law breach of confidence and implied contract claims in situations where plaintiffs attempt to retain rights to share profits and credit in the underlying works</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 9, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=59&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_060910"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=59&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_060910</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a favorable decision for business, the California Supreme Court held that the commercial wholesalers who purchased strawberries from a farmer could not be held liable...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Holds Application for Copyright Registration Sufficient for Initiation of Infringement Suit</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-01-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-01-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A copyright registration is the required ticket for starting an infringement lawsuit in federal court, under 17 U.S.C. &#167; 411.  But will an application suffice to meet that requirement? </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Senate Passes Corporate Governance Reform &#8211; Legislation Affects Public Company Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_05-26-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_05-26-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 20, 2010, the Senate passed the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010 (&quot;RAFSA&quot;). </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: NFL Licensing Arm Subject to Antitrust Laws as a &quot;Contract, Combination ... or Conspiracy&quot;</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_05-24-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_05-24-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 24, in American Needle, Inc. v. National Football League, the Supreme Court unanimously held that NFL Properties (&quot;NFLP&quot;) must defend its licensing decisions under Section 1 of the Sherman Act. NFLP was incorporated by the teams of the National Football League in 1963 to develop, license, and market their intellectual property.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing In Silicon Valley (First Quarter 2010)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=13"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=13</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 104 companies headquartered in Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2010.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Advanced_Copyright_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Advanced_Copyright_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>During recent years, the Internet has become the basic foundational infrastructure for the global movement on data of all kinds.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - May 12, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=58&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_051210"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=58&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_051210</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Ninth Circuit recently affirmed a 2004 district court's decision to certify a nationwide class of women in a gender discrimination class action against Wal-Mart, the country&#8217;s largest retailer.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Dealing With the Uptick In False Marking Suits</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Dealing_With_Uptick.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Dealing_With_Uptick.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-05-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-05-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent months have witnessed a surge in the filing of &quot;false marking&quot; litigation &#8211; suits brought under 35 U.S.C. Section 292.  The section provides penalties against any person that marks an &quot;unpatented article&quot; with any word or number indicating that the article is patented with the intent to deceive the public.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Green Technologies Get a Fast Track at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office&#8212; But Is Anyone Getting on Board?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-04-13_Green_Technologies.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-04-13_Green_Technologies.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As part of the fanfare leading up to the Copenhagen climate talks this past December, the U.S. Government announced a pilot program to accelerate processing of certain patent applications directed to green inventions.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In the opening weeks of 2010, Parliament in London took up a bill to consider whether company directors might be held personally liable in certain areas implicating health and safety of workers.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 13, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=57&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_041310"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=57&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_041310</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Department of Labor Standards Enforcement's strict (and somewhat inconsistent) requirements regarding unpaid interns made it difficult for California businesses to employ them</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Tax Alert: Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project Credits and Grants</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_04-07-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_04-07-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The enactment on March 23, 2010 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 established a 50% nonrefundable tax credit for qualified investments in qualifying therapeutic discovery projects of eligible taxpayers.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Update: FCPA Update: Recent Prosecutions and New Enforcement Tools</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-06-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-06-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The past thirty days have underscored the redoubled efforts by the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate and prosecute violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA or &quot;Act&quot;).</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Guide to the Patent Prosecution Highway</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-04-06_IP_Guide_Patent_Prosecution.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-04-06_IP_Guide_Patent_Prosecution.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-04-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-04-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>From humble beginnings in July 2006 as a one-year pilot agreement between the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO), the Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) has expanded into a full-fledged system of patent examination between more than 10 different patent offices.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: New Legislation Would Fundamentally Alter Public Company Executive Compensation and Corporate Governance</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_03-19-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_03-19-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 15, 2010, Senator Chris Dodd introduced the Restoring American Financial Stability Act of 2010, now commonly referred to as the &#8220;Dodd Bill.&#8221;  The legislation is primarily aimed at reform of the United States financial system to prevent future financial crises, but among its 1,300 pages are significant proposals to change executive compensation and corporate governance rules for all public companies. </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Facing Off On Facebook&#174;? Trademarks and the Social Net</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Facing_Off_Facebook.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Facing_Off_Facebook.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The increasing prevalence and popularity of social networking and similar sites raise new issues for brand
owners and celebrities.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Is There A Second Life For Trademarks In Second Life&#174;?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Is_There_A_Second_Life.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2010-03-17_Is_There_A_Second_Life.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent years have seen the development of online communities through which massive numbers of users can interact with each other and with the environment itself in ways that increasingly approach real-world interactions.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief  - March 12, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=56"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=56</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Tides v. Boeing, a federal district court in Seattle ruled that two employees who leaked documents to the media were not protected whistleblowers under the Sarbanes OxleyAct (&quot;SOX&quot;).</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: It Is Not Over Until It's Over: Antitrust Risks in Unreported Small Acquisitions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_03-10-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_Alert_03-10-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 9, 2009, the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice (&quot;DOJ&quot;) announced that it had brought suit against Election Systems &amp; Software, Inc. (&quot;ES&amp;S&quot;) to challenge its acquisition in September of 2009 of Premier Election Solutions Inc. (&quot;Premier&quot;) from Diebold, Inc.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title> Form 8-K Summary Chart</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/New_Form_8-K_Summary_Chart.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/New_Form_8-K_Summary_Chart.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>An at-a-glance chart that outlines the Form 8-K&#160;disclosure items, corresponding items from the&#160;prior Form 8-K, relation to&#160;safe&#160;harbor provisions and&#160;Form S-3 eligibility, updated.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Form 8-K Reference Chart</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Form_8-K_Reference_Chart.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Form_8-K_Reference_Chart.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-03-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-03-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A detailed reference chart that&#160;highlights event triggers and disclosure requirements for each section of the Form 8-K, updated.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Seven Sins&#8212;Intellectual Property Mistakes Start-Up Technology Companies Should Avoid</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/ip/2010_Seven_Sins.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/ip/2010_Seven_Sins.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The start-up company often is an exciting and fast moving entity.  However, without attention to detail involving intellectual property encompassed within the company product and/or service, the time, effort and sweat equity invested in getting that product and/or service to market can slow down, or even halt, company growth.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing In Silicon Valley (Fourth Quarter 2009)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=12"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=12</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-02-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-02-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 112 companies headquartered in Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2009.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief  - February 10, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=55&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_021010"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=55&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_021010</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-02-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-02-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A California appellate court rejected an employer's affirmative defense that account executives were exempt administrative employees because their work did not relate to the management policies or general business operations of the employer or its customers</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Bracing for Change in Patentability for Methods: Strategies for Companies and Venture Capitalists to Manage the Bilski Risk</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Managing_the_Bilski_Risk.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Managing_the_Bilski_Risk.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Four Fenwick attorneys recently attended an oral argument at the U.S. Supreme Court at which justices surprised the patent community by signaling that they likely will cut back on the types of methods that are eligible for patent protection.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Recent M&amp;A Trends &amp; Developments&#8212;December 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Recent_M&amp;A_Trends_1209.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Recent_M&amp;A_Trends_1209.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent M&amp;A Trends &amp; Developments&#8212;December 2009</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>&quot;Top Ten&quot; M&amp;A Deal Insights From Leading CEOs, CFOs and VCs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Top_Ten_2010.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Top_Ten_2010.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Build a Great Company First. Maximize valuation by building a great company (not just a great product) that is the leader in its market segment.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief  - January 12, 2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=54&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_011210"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=54&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_011210</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>To properly classify an employee as exempt, an employer must satisfy the salary-basis test by paying a salary, &quot;without deduction,&quot; regardless of how many or how few hours the employee works during the pay period. Courts and agencies, however, have allowed employers to deduct from an employee's vacation or sick leave balance in full-day increments without violating the test.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: Congress Extends COBRA Premium Assistance Subsidy</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_01-04-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_01-04-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2010-01-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2010-01-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 19, 2009, President Obama signed the 2010 Department of Defense Appropriations Act (the &quot;DOD Act&quot;), which extended two significant features of the COBRA health care continuation coverage premium subsidy originally enacted in early 2009 by the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (&quot;ARRA&quot;).</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2009/2010</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_09-10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_09-10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent years have seen the development of online communities through which massive numbers of users can interact with each other and with the environment itself in ways that increasingly approach real-world interactions.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SEC Adopts New Public Company Disclosure Requirements About Risk, Corporate Governance and Compensation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_12-18-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_12-18-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Securities and Exchange Commission believes that public company investors are increasingly concerned about corporate accountability. To enhance investors' ability to make informed voting and investment decisions, and help them evaluate company leadership, on December 16, 2009, the SEC adopted rules requiring new disclosures about risk, corporate governance and compensation.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: ESPP Final Regulations Issued</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_12-18-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_12-18-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The IRS and Treasury Department recently issued final employee stock purchase plan (commonly referred to as an &quot;ESPP&quot;) regulations. The final regulations largely adopt the proposed regulations with a notable clarification, described below.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief  - December 11, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=53&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_121109"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=53&amp;WT.mc_id=EB_121109</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although California has a long-standing prohibition on noncompetition agreements, as codified in Business and Professions Code Section 16600, courts have historically allowed such agreements where necessary to protect an employer&#8217;s trade secrets</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Litigation Alert: Federal Circuit Limits Forum-Shopping</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Patent_Litigation_Alert_12-09-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Patent_Litigation_Alert_12-09-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Federal Circuit last week issued two opinions that substantially impact the tactics used in Texas-based patent litigation</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Pools in Life Sciences</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Pools.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Pools.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent pool is defined as an arrangement among multiple patent holders to aggregate their patents where all pooled patents are made available to each member of the pool, and standard licensing terms are offered to licensees who are not members of the pool.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SVAGC 21st Annual All Hands Meeting 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/All_Hands_Presentation_Ws_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/All_Hands_Presentation_Ws_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-12-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>SVAGC 21st Annual All Hands Meeting 2009</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: Action Required for 2010 162(m) Performance Pay</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-24-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-24-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the &quot;Code&quot;) denies a tax deduction to a public company if compensation paid to certain individuals (known as &quot;covered employees&quot;) exceeds one million dollars for the taxable year.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: Section 409A Error Corrections Before Year End</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-20-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-20-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>IRS Notice 2008-113 (the &quot;Notice&quot;) permits employers to correct certain operational errors for purposes of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (&quot;Section 409A&quot;)</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 17, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=52"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=52</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court recently upheld the forfeiture of a departing employee's restricted stock and the money used to purchase it, rejecting the employee's claim it amounted to an unlawful forfeiture of wages.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert : IRS Tax Notice &#8211; Final Regulations Under Section 6039</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-17-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-17-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On November 16, 2009, the IRS issued final regulations relating to the return and information statement requirements under Section 6039 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the &quot;Code&quot;)</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Are Juries Ready to Decide Underlying Questions of Fact? Obviously Not</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Are_Juries_Ready_to_Decide.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Are_Juries_Ready_to_Decide.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court has told us that obviousness in patent cases is a question of law, based on underlying findings of fact. What this means is that juries as fact-finders are supposed to decide the underlying factual issues, but judges are supposed to decide the ultimate legal question of patent validity.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing In Silicon Valley (Third Quarter 2009)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=11"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=11</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-11-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-11-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 103 companies headquartered in Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the third quarter of 2009.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 15, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=51"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=51</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-10-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Flu season is upon us, and this year the concerns are heightened due to the threat posed by the H1N1 influenza virus (also referred to as the swine flu). Presently, thirty seven states, including California and Washington, have reported widespread swine flu activity, and the Centers For Disease Control (CDC) is recommending that individuals take precautions to reduce the likelihood of virus transmission. In light of the possible impact of the swine flu (or other communicable disease) on businesses, employers should be prepared to address both the practical and legal concerns arising from an outbreak.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Bulletin Fall 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-10-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-10-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A recent ruling in a highly publicized case in the United States District Court for the Central District of California rejected an aggressive legal theory that could have led to broad criminalization of the breach of terms conditioning access to websites and other computerized information.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 9, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=50"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=50</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-09-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Van Asdale v. International Game Technology, the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit issued its first decision defining the scope of protected conduct under the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (&quot;SOX&quot;). </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Bilski Briefs Span Wide Range of Positions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/IP/Bilski_Brief.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/IP/Bilski_Brief.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 1, the Supreme Court agreed to decide a case that will have a great impact on what types of inventions can be patented.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Ariad Written Description Ruling Could Significantly Impact Biotech Patents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2009-09-02_Ariad_Written_Description.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2009-09-02_Ariad_Written_Description.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The fate of many chemical and biotechnology patents will soon depend on the Federal Circuit's interpretation of the first paragraph of section 112 of the Patent Act.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: Another 401(k) Headache: Covering Leased Employees</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_08-27-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_08-27-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a recent employee benefits alert, we looked at temporary and part-time employees, and the circumstances under which an employer must cover them under its 401(k) plan.... </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc.&#8212;The Federal Circuit Holds 35 U.S.C. &#167; 271(f) Inapplicable to Method Claims</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-24-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-24-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 19, 2009, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, limited the reach of 35 U.S.C. &#167; 271(f), holding that the statute does not apply to method claims. The Federal Circuit's decision in Cardiac Pacemakers, Inc. v. St. Jude Medical, Inc., _F.3d_ (Fed. Cir. 2009) (en banc in part) (Lourie, J.), reversed its earlier holding in Union Carbide Chemicals Plastics Technology Corp. v. Shell Oil Co., 425 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2005).</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 14, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=49"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=49</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Balancing employee privacy rights and an employer's right to monitor its workplace is a challenge. In Hernandez v. Hillsides, Inc., the California Supreme Court clarified the law in this area and articulated important principles regarding workplace privacy</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing In Silicon Valley (Second Quarter 2009)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=10"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=10</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 89 companies headquartered in the Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2009.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: 2009 Update on Stock Options in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-07-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-07-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is an overview of some of the legal and strategic issues related to a U.S. parent company granting stock options to employees of its Indian subsidiary, including consideration of exchange controls, securities laws and tax burdens.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: House Passes Executive Compensation Bill</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-05-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-05-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 3, the House, led by Representative Barney Frank, passed the Corporate and Financial Institution Compensation Fairness Act of 2009 (H.R. 3269), which applies to public companies and would (i) give shareholders a &quot;say on pay&quot; by providing a nonbinding, advisory vote on the company's pay practices for top executives... more</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Update: Compensation and Corporate Governance Disclosure Update</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-27-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-27-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a July 10 release, the SEC published proposed rules to expand the level of disclosure in proxy statements, primarily in the areas of executive compensation and corporate governance...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>An Unclear Diagnosis</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/An_Unclear_Diagnosis.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/An_Unclear_Diagnosis.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>What constitutes patentable subject matter? The tension between the broad language of 35 U.S.C. Section 101 and the limitations of its scope by the courts is playing out in the context of patent eligibility of process claimsy...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 16, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=48"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=48</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California and U.S. Supreme Courts handed down three very important decisions in recent weeks that affect several key aspects of employment law...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Vinole v. Countrywide</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-13-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-13-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Ninth Circuit's recent opinion in Vinole v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., &#8211; F.3d &#8211;, 2009 WL 1926444 (9th Cir. July 7, 2009), established precedent in this Circuit: A defendant may move to deny class certification before a plaintiff moves to have the class certified, and need not wait until the close of discovery to do so...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (Fourth Quarter of 2008 &amp; First Quarter of 2009)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q4_2008_+_Q1_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q4_2008_+_Q1_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for 27 Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2008 and in the first quarter of 2009...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Bulletin Summer 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) began in July 2006 as a pilot, one-year cooperative agreement between the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the Japan Patent Office (JPO). </summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>EIM and Litigation Alert: California eDiscovery Legislation Signed Into Law, Effective Immediately</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/EIM_Alert_07-06-09_California_eDiscovery_Signed_Into_Law.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/EIM_Alert_07-06-09_California_eDiscovery_Signed_Into_Law.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 29, 2009, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed into law AB 5, California&#8217;s first set of statutes designed to address the realities of electronic discovery</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: A Trap for the Unwary Employer: Failure to Cover Part-Time and Temporary Employees Under a 401(k) Plan</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_07-02-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_07-02-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Clients often ask us whether certain groups of employees, such as part-time or temporary employees, must be covered under their 401(k) plan</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Update: Major Corporate Governance Proposals Are on the Way</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-02-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_07-02-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-07-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-07-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 1 the Securities and Exchange Commission took action on three measures that affect public company compensation and governance</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate Governance Reforms and Executive Compensation &#8211; The Perfect Storm</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_06-24-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_06-24-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Over the next few months we are likely to witness the development of a &quot;perfect storm&quot; of corporate governance reforms and executive compensation changes at U.S. public companies.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-22-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-22-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Court of Appeal's recent opinion in FLIR Sys., Inc. v. Parrish, ___ Cal. App. 4th ___, 2009 Cal. App. LEXIS 943 (2d Dist. June 15, 2009) reinforces the need for careful deliberation in determining when and where to seek injunctive relief against trade secret misappropriation by former employees</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Federal Initiatives Affecting Corporate Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/Corporate/Federal_Initiatives.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/Corporate/Federal_Initiatives.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In recent weeks, leading legislators and regulators have announced a series of initiatives arising, in one way or another, out of the recent economic crisis.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Necessity of eGovernment</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/General_Firm/2009_EGovernment.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/General_Firm/2009_EGovernment.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This paper presents the positive and negative impact information technology (IT) has had on governance in the United States and argues that effective and efficient eGovernment is a necessity created by the increased and widespread use of IT in the private sector.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 10, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=47"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=47</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Applied Materials v. Advanced Micro-Fabrication Equipment Company, the federal district court for the Northern District of California refused to enforce an invention assignment clause that required former employees to assign inventions disclosed within one year of termination of employment if the invention related to work performed by the employee for the employer....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Update: SEC Update&#8212;SEC Proposed Rules Would Make It Easier For Stockholders to Nominate Board Members; Compensation Disclosure Changes On The Way</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_06-09-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_06-09-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The SEC announced that it will propose amendments to the proxy rules to facilitate the ability of stockholders to propose nominees for election to a board of directors.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Licensing Basics for  Technology and Life Sciences Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Licensing.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Licensing.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-06-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-06-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Virtually all  technology companies rely on licenses to achieve their business goals.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing in the San Francisco Bay Area (First Quarter 2009)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=9"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=9</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 92 companies headquartered in the Silicon Valley that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2009.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing and Reliance Rules for 17200 Consumer Class Action Claims</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-20-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-20-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 18, 2009, a split California Supreme Court handed down its long awaited decision of In Re Tobacco II Cases (S147345), clarifying the effect of Proposition 64 on the unfair competition law (&quot;UCL&quot;) (Bus. &amp; Prof. Code, &#167; 17200 et seq.) in consumer class actions....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Top Ten Patent Issues for the New Director of the Patent and Trademark Office</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Top_Ten_Patent_Issues.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Top_Ten_Patent_Issues.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Imminently, the Obama Administration will be naming a new Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (&amp;quot;PTO&amp;quot;). The PTO, which used to be a quiet backwater of a niche area of law, has recently found itself front and center in some high profile debates. From congressional efforts aimed at fixing a &amp;quot;broken&amp;quot; patent system to Supreme Court cases considering whether Internet Age innovations deserve the same patent protection as Industrial Age innovations, the work of the PTO is increasingly important to our society.....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Transfer of Intellectual Property Rights: Can There Be Too Much Freedom in the Marketplace for Ideas?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Transfer_IP_Rights.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Transfer_IP_Rights.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We Americans take for granted the fact that intellectual property rights can be transferred from one person to another. A small &quot;garage&quot; inventor can sell patent rights to a manufacturing company. Two sparring competitors can settle their disputes by a cross-license of rights. Franchises can be built by licensing out trade secrets to local operators....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: Update on Health Care Reform: Has San Francisco Finally &quot;Cracked the ERISA Code?&quot;</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_05-14-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Employee_Benefits_Alert_05-14-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Department of Labor has just released several model notices  (including election forms) to reflect the new COBRA subsidy requirements of  ARRA, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - May 14, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=46"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=46</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although the swine flu outbreak appears to have peaked (for the time being), employers should nevertheless remain vigilant and take the following proactive steps to deal with a potential full blown pandemic...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Cleantech Client Alert: Newly-Launched ARPA-E Announces $150 Million Funding Opportunity for &quot;Transformational&quot; Energy Technologies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/CTA_05-06-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/CTA_05-06-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-05-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-05-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 27, 2009, the Department of Energy announced the availability of up to $150 million of funding for research and development on transformational energy-related technologies.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2009 Update to Guide to Starting a Corporation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Guide_Starting_Corp.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Guide_Starting_Corp.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This guide describes certain basic considerations and costs involved in forming a Delaware or California corporation.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2009 Update: Raising the Initial Funding for High Technology Companies in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary of the process for raising initial funding in the Bay Area for high technology companies. We hope to help entrepreneurs seeking initial funding understand the alternatives, identify potential funding sources and, most importantly, understand the practical realities of raising initial funding in the Bay Area...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Key Service Agreement Issues: Service Providers Checklist</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Key_Service_Agreement_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Key_Service_Agreement_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Outsourcing of technology-related services continues to grow.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Legal Resource Guide For Entrepreneurs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Legal_Resource_Guide.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2009_Legal_Resource_Guide.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>No single factor is controlling in determining the form of business organization to select, but if the business is expected to expand rapidly, a corporation will usually be the best alternative because of the availability of employee incentive stock plans; ease of accommodating outside investment and greater long-term liquidity alternatives for shareholders.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Leegin Returns to East Texas to Die: Epic Vertical Price Fixing Case Goes Full Circle</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_04-16-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_04-16-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Earlier this month, the Eastern District of Texas dismissed all claims in an antitrust case that has made history.  In 2007, the United States Supreme Court shook the antitrust world with its decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., 127 S.Ct. 2705 (2007)...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Clarifies Standing and Reliance Rules for 17200 Consumer Class Action Claims</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-20-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-20-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 18, 2009, a split California Supreme Court handed down its long awaited decision of In Re Tobacco II Cases (S147345), clarifying the effect of Proposition 64 on the unfair competition law (&amp;quot;UCL&amp;quot;) (Bus. &amp;amp; Prof. Code, &amp;sect; 17200 et seq.) in consumer class actions....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 15, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=45"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=45</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In 14 Penn Plaza v. Pyett, the Supreme Court ruled (5-4) that provisions in collective bargaining agreements requiring union members to arbitrate claims arising under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act can bar private lawsuits by aggrieved employees....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Protecting Innovation: Cleantech and Patents Are Natural Allies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/Protecting_Innovation_Cleantech.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/Protecting_Innovation_Cleantech.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In recent years, the private sector's efforts to develop responses to environmental challenges have focused strongly on technological solutions.  For many businesses in this field, patent protection for innovative technology is a key element of their business strategies.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Imminent Funding Opportunities for Clean Tech Companies But Funding Comes with Conditions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/American_Recovery_Reinvestmen_Act_CT_040309.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Cleantech/American_Recovery_Reinvestmen_Act_CT_040309.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 represents the largest government stimulus package in U.S. history. As has been widely reported, President Obama has made the development and adoption of clean technologies a core goal of his policy initiatives.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Shrinking Prospects for Private Trade Secret Actions Under the CFAA</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Shrinking_Prospects_CFAA.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Shrinking_Prospects_CFAA.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-04-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), 18 U.S.C. &#167; 1030, was enacted in 1984 as a criminal statute, but was subsequently amended in the 1990s to allow for private causes of action for damage to a &quot;protected computer.&quot;</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: New COBRA Subsidy Model Notices</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/emp-benefits_alert_03-24-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/emp-benefits_alert_03-24-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Department of Labor has just released several model notices  (including election forms) to reflect the new COBRA subsidy requirements of  ARRA, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A bipartisan quartet of senators and representatives held a press conference on March 3, 2009 announcing yet another push at patent law reform. Hearings commenced the following week...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: California Supreme Court Settles Law Regarding Enforceability of Non-Competition Agreements, Releases of Claims</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-19-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-19-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Court of Appeal for the Sixth Appellate District recently issued an important decision confirming the preemptive effect of California&#8217;s Uniform Trade Secrets Act (&quot;CUTSA&quot;) on common law claims...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Starting a Company Now?? - Founder and Formation Issues in a Turbulent Economy</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TIE_INSTITUTE_031809.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TIE_INSTITUTE_031809.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>TiE Institute - Statrting a Company Now?? Founder and Formation Issues in a Turbulent Market....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trolls 2.0</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-18_Trolls.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-18_Trolls.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Last week, a bipartisan quartet of senators introduced yet another round of patent reform legislation.  As with the prior unsuccessful attempts in recent years, the bills proposed in the House and the Senate address a variety of issues, such as the measure of damages that a patentee can recover from an infringer....</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Silicon Valley Life Science VC Survey</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2008_Lifesciences_VC_Survey_F.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2008_Lifesciences_VC_Survey_F.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The results of our fifth annual San Francisco Bay Area Life Science Venture Capital Valuation Survey...</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Making Sense of the Revived &quot;Machine-or-Transformation&quot; Test in In re  Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 30, 2008, in In re Bilski, No. 07-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008) the Federal Circuit handed down the latest judicial effort to provide guidance about the types of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>On Shaky Ground: The (Near) Future of Patents After Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-03-16_In_re_Bilski.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 30, 2008, in In re Bilski, No. 07-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008) the Federal Circuit handed down the latest judicial effort to provide guidance about the types of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 12, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=44"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=44</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A group of Oracle employees who resided outside California but traveled into the state periodically to perform work for Oracle sued the company, claiming that they were entitled to the benefits of California's more favorable overtime laws....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>FAQ on International Patent Strategy and Execution</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-02-05_FAQ_international_patent.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/2009-02-05_FAQ_international_patent.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The selection of an invention for patenting must be based on the business goals and needs of the client. This mandates that the prosecutor take the time to understand the patentee's business, and not merely its technology&amp;#8211;the mere technical 'coolness' of an invention is not a sufficient reason for patenting it....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (Second Half of 2008)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_H2_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_H2_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for 43 Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in the second half of 2008....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing in the San Francisco Bay Area (Fourth Quarter 2008)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=8"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=8</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 128 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money  in the fourth quarter of 2008....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: Latest Restrictions on Compensation of Executives at Financial Institutions Receiving Assistance Under the Troubled Asset Relief Program</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_02-26-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_02-26-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (&quot;ARRA&quot;) that became law on February 17, 2009, imposes new restrictions on compensation of certain executives at financial institutions that receive assistance under the Troubled Asset Relief Program (&quot;TARP&quot;) under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (&quot;EESA&quot;)....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>A Framework for Identifying Inventions Worth Patenting</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Framework_Identifying_Inventions.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Framework_Identifying_Inventions.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The selection of an invention for patenting must be based on the business goals and needs of the client. This mandates that the prosecutor take the time to understand the patentee's business, and not merely its technology&amp;#8211;the mere technical 'coolness' of an invention is not a sufficient reason for patenting it....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employee Benefits Alert: COBRA Subsidy Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_02-23-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_02-23-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On February 17, President Barack Obama signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (&amp;quot;ARRA&amp;quot;) into law.  This stimulus package provides significant health care continuation coverage relief for lower- and moderate-income employees who are involuntarily terminated between September 1, 2008 and December 31, 2009...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Officers' Fiduciary Duties and Refines the Application of the Common Law Doctrine of Shareholder Ratification</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_02-18-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_02-18-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Gantler vs. Stephens (Del. January 27, 2009) &amp;#8211; where the Court issued a rare reversal of a Court of Chancery decision &amp;#8211; contains several noteworthy holdings on core corporate governance principles...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - February 9, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=43"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=43</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-02-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-02-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>President Obama has signed into law the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009 (&quot;Fair Pay Act&quot;), which provides that an unlawful employment practice occurs not only when an employer makes a discriminatory decision about the employee';s compensation, but each time an employee receives a paycheck or other compensation affected by the discrimination....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Update&#8212;Must A Corporation Disclose Privileged Information To Avoid Prosecution, And If It Does So, Will It Be At The Mercy Of The Plaintiffs' Bar? &#8211; Recent Developments In DOJ  Policy And Case Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_01-21-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_01-21-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many boards and executives of corporations subject to criminal and civil regulatory investigations have grappled with the highly charged decision of whether to provide the government with privileged communications and attorney work product....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Law Year in Review: 2008-2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/1-15-09_PLYIR_Materials.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/1-15-09_PLYIR_Materials.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A Look Back at 2008 and A Look Ahead at 2009....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Costco Decision Could Significantly Change Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/Litigation/Costco_Decision.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/Litigation/Costco_Decision.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The case of Costco Wholesale Corporation v. Superior Court, currently pending before the California Supreme Court, may dramatically affect the manner in which clients interact with and utilize their lawyers....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - January 13, 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=42"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=42</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although Starbucks has been the target of numerous class action lawsuits in the U.S., the company defeated plaintiffs in one recent class action arising out of the criminal background question in its job application....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>On Shaky Ground: The (Near) Future of Patents After Bilski</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/On_Shaky_Ground.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/On_Shaky_Ground.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Bernard Bilski did not intend to be a poster child for business method inventions. He filed his patent application more than a year before the Federal Circuit decided...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Tax Notice For Incentive Stock Options and Employee Stock Purchase Plans</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-07-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-07-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Section 6039 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the &quot;Code&quot;) requires that by January 31, 2009, employers provide certain information to their employees (or former employees) who in 2008 either exercised &quot;incentive stock options&quot; (&quot;ISOs&quot;) or transferred shares purchased under an &quot;employee stock purchase plan&quot; (an &quot;ESPP&quot;)....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Mergers and Acquisitions Alert: New HSR Thresholds for 2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/MA_Alert_01-07-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/MA_Alert_01-07-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2009-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2009-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The dollar thresholds for pre-acquisition filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act will increase mid-February (exact date still pending), due to an annual adjustment mechanism that was created in the last round of amendments to the HSR Act...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2008/2009</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_2008_2009.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_2008_2009.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Personalized medicine companies should implement new strategies to deal with the challenges associated with protecting their inventions...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Program Permits Avoiding Section 409A's 20% Penalty Tax for Certain Unintentional, Operational Violations Under Certain Compensation Arrangements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_12-16-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_12-16-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Dec. 5 the IRS announced Notice 2008-113, providing correction methods for certain unintentional, operational failures in relation to non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements and certain equity awards that would otherwise invoke the 20% penalty tax under Section 409A...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - December 10, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=41"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=41</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary></summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Affirms District Court's Dismissal of Securities Class Action</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_12-08-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_12-08-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On November 26, 2008, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a securities fraud lawsuit brought by Glazer Capital Management against InVision Technologies, Inc. and two of its executive officers....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>In re Swanson: Ex Parte Reexamination in the Patent Office Provides Second Chance to Invalidate Patent</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/In_Re_Swanson.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/In_Re_Swanson.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-12-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-12-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>It may not literally keep in-house attorneys up at night, but the chance that a relevant patent owned by another may unexpectedly show up on one's desk in the morning is certainly not a pleasant thought.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: FINRA Announces Changes to Analyst Rules</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-24-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-24-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or FINRA, as part of its process of enacting a consolidated rulebook, announced proposed changes to its existing conflicts of interest rules regarding research analysts...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing in the San Francisco Bay Area (Third Quarter 2008)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=7"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=7</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-11-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 101 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the third quarter of 2008. There has recently been substantial distress and volatility in world financial markets...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 20, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=40"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=40</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court recently granted review of Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court, in which a Court of Appeal held that an employer's obligation to &amp;quot;provide&amp;quot; rest and meal breaks to employees means only that the employer must make such breaks available to employees...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation and Tax Alert: DOJ Targets Approximately 20,000 Investors as Co-Conspirators in Criminal Tax Fraud Investigation of UBS</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_11-19-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_11-19-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-11-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-11-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The United States Department of Justice has opened a new front on its war against allegedly fraudulent tax shelters...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Alert: Federal Circuit en banc Clarifies the Test for Determining When Processes are Patentable</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_10-31-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_10-31-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a long-awaited decision, on October 30, 2008, the Federal Circuit en banc decided In re Bilski, clarifying the test for determining whether a process patent claim qualifies as patentable subject matter under Section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: M&amp;A Development&#8212;Additional Guidance from the Delaware Chancery Court on MAE Clauses</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_10-22-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_10-22-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Hexion v. Huntsman provides lessons on what constitutes a Material Adverse Effect and the meaning of &quot;reasonable best efforts&quot; and &quot;knowing and intentional breach.&quot;...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>NASDAQ Temporarily Suspends Minimum Bid Price and Minimum Market Value Requirements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/NASDAQ_Temp_Suspends_Min_Bid.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/NASDAQ_Temp_Suspends_Min_Bid.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 16, 2008, The NASDAQ OMX Group suspended the bid price and market value of publicly held shares requirements for all NASDAQ-listed companies...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Advanced Copyright Issues on the Internet</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Advanced_Copyright_10-20-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Advanced_Copyright_10-20-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>During recent years, the Internet has become the basic foundational infrastructure for the global movement on data of all kinds.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Still Blurry Standards for Proving Trademark Dilution</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Blurry_Trademark_Dilution.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Blurry_Trademark_Dilution.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In 2006, Congress passed the Trademark Dilution Revision Act, or &amp;quot;TDRA.&amp;quot;  Hailed by some and criticized by others, the TDRA was widely expected to make it easier for the owners of famous trademarks to prevail in claims for trademark dilution...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Fisher Tool Co., v. Gillet Outillage, 530 F.3d 1063 (9th Cir. 2008), the Ninth Circuit adopted the Federal Circuit's standard requiring a showing of bad faith in order to maintain Lanham Act and state law claims premised on allegedly false representations of patent infringement made by a patentee, its distributors, agents and/or attorneys to third parties...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 7, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=39"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=39</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As of September 30, 2008, exempt computer professionals in California can be paid a minimum of $75,000 per year for full-time employment on a salaried basis, rather than the previous requirement of at least $36 per hour...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>FASB to Reconsider Plan for Sweeping Changes to Contingent Liabilities Disclosures</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/FASB_Reconsider_10-01-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/FASB_Reconsider_10-01-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-10-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-10-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On September 24, 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (&quot;FASB&quot;) decided to reconsider its previously-proposed amendments to FASB Statement No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (&quot;Statement 5&quot;), and FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Developing a Patent Strategy - A Checklist for Getting Started</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Checklist.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Checklist.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-09-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>For many technology companies, developing a patent strategy is an important component of the business plan.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 18, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=38"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=38</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-09-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Avila v. Continental Airlines, Inc. is the latest court decision to highlight the often complex intersection between disability and medical leave laws...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Io v. Veoh&#8212;DMCA Covers Video Upload Site Charged With Exposing Skin Flicks</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Io_V_Veoh.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Io_V_Veoh.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-09-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In an important decision with potential implications for the Viacom v. YouTube suit and for every website that hosts user-supplied content, a Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California has granted summary judgment against a publisher of &quot;adult&quot; films...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Information Management for Mergers and Acquisitions &#8211; Wrangling, Lassoing and Roping at the M&amp;A Corral</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/EIM/VCE_Wrangling_Lassoing_Roping_M&amp;A_Corral.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/publications/EIM/VCE_Wrangling_Lassoing_Roping_M&amp;A_Corral.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>When one company acquires some or all of the assets or divisions of another, the acquirer faces a recurring set of issues related to electronic information management. Forethought is necessary to ensure the acquirer follow best business practices and comply with legal obligations when...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Terms of Venture Financing in the San Francisco Bay Area (Second Quarter 2008)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=6"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=6</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 108 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2008. The results of the 2Q08 survey show that companies raising venture capital in 2Q08 continued to receive higher valuations than in their prior round...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 12, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=37"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=37</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>California DLSE: Employers Must Make Meal and Rest Breaks Available, Need Not Ensure Employees Take Breaks&amp;#8212;and Yet Another Court Agrees; California Supreme Court Confirms Non-competes are Unenforceable in California, Eases Requirements on Releases; NLRB Strikes Down Firing of Employee Who Breached an Illegal Confidentiality Provision; News Bites...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Auction Rate Securities&#8212;Recent Settlements with SEC and Other Regulators</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-11-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-11-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 7 and 8, the Securities  and Exchange Commission announced settlements with Citigroup Global Markets and  UBS Securities and UBS Financial Services Inc....
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: California Supreme Court Settles Law Regarding Enforceability of Non-Competition Agreements, Releases of Claims</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-08-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-08-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court has ruled in Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLP, ___ Cal. 4th ___ , 2008 Cal. LEXIS 9618 (Cal. Aug. 7, 2008) (No. S147190), that non-competition agreements in California are invalid under California Business and Professions Code Section 16600 (&quot;Section 16600&quot;)...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Cartoon Network v. Cablevision&#8212;Buffer Reproductions Are Not Infringing Copies, Holds Second Circuit in &quot;Remote&quot; DVR Case</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/CartoonNetwork_V_Cablevision.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/CartoonNetwork_V_Cablevision.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-08-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-08-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a long-awaited ruling, the Second Circuit held on Monday that unauthorized reproductions of data, such as digital movie files, in computer buffers are not infringing copies because they were not fixed &quot;for a period of more than transitory duration.&quot; ...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Vegans (and Foodies) Rejoice: D.C. Circuit Rules for FTC in Whole Foods Merger Case</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_07-30-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_07-30-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a two to one decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia has given the FTC a major victory for its merger enforcement jurisdiction...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Opinion Letters in the Wake of In re Seagate Technology</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Opinion_Letters_Seagate.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Opinion_Letters_Seagate.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Patent infringement is a strict liability offense, the nature of which is only considered to determine whether infringement was willful and enhanced damages are warranted. For decades, accused infringers in patent infringement lawsuits relied on opinions of counsel to defend against willful infringement claims that may lead to enhanced damages...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Alert: July 23, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EBA_07-23-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EBA_07-23-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a victory for California employers, a California appellate court ruled that an employer's duty to &quot;provide&quot; rest and meal breaks to employees means that the employer need only make such breaks available to employees, and not that it ensure that employees actually take such breaks.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Rejecting the authority of a trio of more recent Ninth Circuit cases on the ground that their holdings could not be reconciled with an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, a Washington District Court has held a transfer of computer software to represent a sale, not a license...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SEC Extends Date of Auditor Attestation for Non-Accelerated Filers</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/SEC_Extends_Date_Auditor.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/SEC_Extends_Date_Auditor.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 26, 2008, the SEC announced it extended the date for non-accelerated filers to include in Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Form 10-KSB the auditor attestation required under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 10, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=36"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=36</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Company, police officer Quon sued a wireless company and his employer City of Ontario for violating his privacy by accessing his personal text messages sent by way of an employer-provided pager.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Adopts Good Faith Defense for Lanham Act Claims Premised on Allegedly False Patent Infringement Allegations Made to Third Parties</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-08-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-08-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-07-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-07-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Fisher Tool Co., Inc. v. Gillet Outillage, __ F.3d __, 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 13727 (June 30, 2008), the Ninth Circuit adopted the Federal Circuit's standard requiring a showing of bad faith in order to maintain Lanham Act and state law claims premised on allegedly false representations...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Think You Are a Co-Owner of a Copyright?&#8212;Think Again</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Think_You_Are_A_Co-Owner_Of_A_Copyright_06-16-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Think_You_Are_A_Co-Owner_Of_A_Copyright_06-16-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many copyright owners co-own their copyrights with others, or at least they thought so until the decision came down in Sybersound Records, Inc. v. UAV Corp., 517 F.3d 1137 (9th Cir. 2008)...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 10, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=35"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=35</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In CBOCS West, Inc. v. Humphries, the United States Supreme Court decided (in a 7-2 vote) that 42 U.S.C. &amp;sect; 1981, which was enacted shortly after the Civil War as part of the Civil Rights Act of 1866 to prohibit race discrimination, also encompasses claims of retaliation in employment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert:  Quanta v. LG Electronics &#8212; The Supreme Court Revives the Patent Exhaustion Doctrine</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-09-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-09-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-06-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 9, the Supreme Court issued an important decision affecting the doctrine of exhaustion of patent rights through licensing of patented methods and components.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Just as a semiconductor clean room aims to exclude airborne particles that could contaminate wafer layers, so the legal software clean room has sought to protect computer software developers from contaminating &amp;quot;access&amp;quot; to earlier works they might be charged with copying...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - May 15, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=34"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=34</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a victory for employers, a California appellate court confirmed owners, officers, and managing agents' limited personal liability under California law for a corporation's failure to pay wages.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Privacy Alert: Gov't Rummaging Through Your Laptop's Contents? No Problem If You're Re-Entering USA, Says Ninth Circuit</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Privacy_Alert_04-30-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Privacy_Alert_04-30-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-04-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>You've gotten used to being asked to turn on your laptop as you go through airport security so the authorities can confirm it's really a computer and not a bomb...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Rambus Dodges an Antitrust Bullet from the FTC</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_04-24-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_04-24-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-04-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a case closely-watched by the high technology community, this week the D.C. Circuit Court set aside the FTC&#8217;s landmark order against Rambus Incorporated...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Section 409A Valuations and Stock Option Grants for Start-up Technology and Life Science Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/409_Valuations_Stock_Options.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/409_Valuations_Stock_Options.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Federal, and at least one state's, tax laws  make it especially important for companies granting stock options as compensation to set the exercise price of the underlying shares at or above the price that can be shown by a reasonable valuation method to be fair market value (FMV) at the time of grant.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 11, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=33"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=33</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-04-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a victory for employers, the California Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in Jones v. The Lodge at Torrey Pines Partnership that supervisors cannot be held personally liable for retaliation under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert:  Roommate.com en banc</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-08-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-08-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-04-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-04-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Ninth Circuit has issued a long-awaited decision affecting the scope of the safe haven under the Communications Decency Act (&quot;CDA&quot;) for internet service providers against liability for information created and provided by third parties.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Federal Circuit to Re-Assess Standards for Patent-Eligible Subject Matter</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Federal_Circuit.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Federal_Circuit.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The subject matter requirement prescribed in 35 U.S.C. section 101 has lately been back on the Federal Circuit Court's radar.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SOX Litigation-Hold Triggers &#8212; Public and Private Companies Susceptible to Criminal Prosecution for Obstruction of Justice</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/SOX_Litigation-Hold_Triggers.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/SOX_Litigation-Hold_Triggers.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Years after passage of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, many companies still believe the Act applies uniquely to public companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Silicon Valley Life Science VC Survey</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2007_Lifesciences_VC_Survey.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/vcsurvey/2007_Lifesciences_VC_Survey.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The results of our fourth annual San Francisco Bay Area Life Science Venture Capital Valuation Survey show a continuation of the positive trend in the life science venture environment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Seventh Circuit Upholds CDA Immunity for Craigslist&#8212;But What Is The Impact, If Any, On Roommate.com?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-17-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-17-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 14, 2007, the Seventh Circuit issued an important decision regarding the scope of the safe haven under the Communications Decency Act (&quot;CDA&quot;) for internet service providers against liability for information created and provided by third parties.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 11, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=32"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=32</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Sprint/United Mgmt. Co. v. Mendelsohn, the United State Supreme Court held that &amp;quot;me too&amp;quot; evidence of discrimination is neither per se admissible nor per se inadmissible in an age discrimination lawsuit...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Fourth Quarter 2007)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=4"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=4</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 103 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2008</title>
        <link href="After unanimous approval by the California Assembly and the California Senate, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed S.B. 771 into law on October 10, 2007, amending California Civil Code section 3344.1."/>
        <id>After unanimous approval by the California Assembly and the California Senate, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger signed S.B. 771 into law on October 10, 2007, amending California Civil Code section 3344.1.</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-03-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-03-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary></summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Releases Guidance for 162(m) Compensation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-22-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-22-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On February 21, 2008, the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2008-13, confirming the position taken in PLR 200804004 that compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>A Summary of Enterprises Income Tax Law of the People's Republic of China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Summary_Enterprise_Tax_Law_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Summary_Enterprise_Tax_Law_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Foreign invested enterprises (&amp;quot;FIE&amp;quot;) and domestic enterprises1 were subject to different income tax regulations and tax rates in China in the past. For example, as compared with domestic enterprises, FIEs generally were eligible for a lower income tax rate and more tax deductions and exemptions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Officers' Fiduciary Duties and Refines the Application of the Common Law Doctrine of Shareholder Ratification</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_02-18-09.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_02-18-09.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Gantler vs. Stephens (Del. January 27, 2009) &#8211; where the Court issued a rare reversal of a Court of Chancery decision &#8211; contains several noteworthy holdings on core corporate governance principles...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: Performance Based Compensation is Non-Excludible Under 162(m) If Also Payable Under An Employment Agreement As Severance</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-14-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-14-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We alerted you on January 31, 2008 (and provided a further update on February 8, 2008), that the IRS now takes the position that compensation intended to qualify as deductible performance-based compensation pursuant to Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update: Raising the Initial Funding for High Technology Companies in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary of the process for raising initial funding in the Bay Area for high technology companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: Payments Do Not Qualify as Performance-Based Compensation Under 162(m) Where Payments are Permitted Under a Severance Arrangement</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-08-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_02-08-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Internal Revenue Service published a private letter ruling on January 28, 2008 (PLR 200804004) holding that amounts paid to a recipient under an incentive compensation plan intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the &quot;Code&quot;) will not qualify as performance-based compensation...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - February 8, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=31"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=31</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a significant ruling for employers, the California Supreme Court recently held that an employer is not required to accommodate an employee who uses medical marijuana.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update to Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Est_Subsidiary_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Est_Subsidiary_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-02-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-02-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although the current dollar-rupee exchange rate is causing more consideration of other locations, many businesses in the U.S. continue to move a portion of their development, support and other operations offshore to India, primarily for cost-saving reason.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: Securities and Exchange Commission Adopts Amendments to Rules 144 and 145</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-30-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-30-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>For the first time since 1997, the SEC has made significant amendments to Rules 144 and 145 under the Securities Act of 1933 (the &amp;quot;Securities Act&amp;quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The Next Corporate Scandal?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_01-28-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_01-28-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As the stock option backdating cases wind down, what will be the next corporate scandal to gain widespread notoriety?
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>A Summary of the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Labor_Contract_Law_China_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Labor_Contract_Law_China_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Thirteen years ago, the Labor Law of the People's Republic of China (&amp;quot;Labor Law&amp;quot;) was released, which is a fundamental law to govern employment relationships between employers and employees in China.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update to Doing Business in China via the Cayman Islands</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Update_Business_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Update_Business_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many companies doing business in China are using a structure which includes a company formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands (&amp;quot;CI&amp;quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: New HSR Thresholds for 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-18-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-18-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The dollar thresholds for pre-acquisition filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act will increase at the end of February (exact date still pending), due to an annual adjustment mechanism that was created in the last round of amendments to the HSR Act.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Law Year in Review: With The Close Of An Active 2007, What Does 2008 Hold?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Supreme Court Leaves Its Mark in 2007; Federal Circuit Weighs in on Patent Licensing; What&#8217;s Coming up in 2008; Patent Reform and Rule Changes; Reconsidering What Is Patentable Subject Matter; Reexamination Trends; Ethics Issues in Patent Law
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Alert: eProxy Rules Are Now Effective for Large Accelerated Filers</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-16-08.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_01-16-08.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Securities and Exchange Commission adopted an amendment to its proxy statement rules in July 2007 regarding electronic availability of proxy materials.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - January 8, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=30"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=30</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The NLRB ruled in The Guard Publishing Company, dba The Register Guard that employers may enforce a policy that prohibits employees from using employer email for &amp;quot;non-job-related solicitations&amp;quot; (including union organizing efforts), so long as they do so in a non-discriminatory manner.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Third Quarter 2007)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=3"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=3</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 104 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the third quarter of 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update to Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Est_Subsidiary_China_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Est_Subsidiary_China_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As China's strength in the global economy continues to grow, businesses need to consider the prospect of establishing operations within its borders.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update to Implementing Share Incentive Schemes in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2008_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This memorandum is an overview of the legal and strategic issues related to implementing share incentive schemes in China, including understanding Chinese cultural views of employment and compensation, structuring share incentive schemes to comply with applicable Chinese currency controls and securities law restrictions and the tax consequences of options to the employees.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2008 Update to Investment and Operating in Restricted Industries in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China_2008.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China_2008.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2008-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>There are a number of business sectors in China such as telecommunications services, online commerce and auction in which direct foreign investment is restricted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - December 10, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=29"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=29</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-12-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Mokler v. County of Orange, a California Court of Appeal held there was sufficient evidence to support a plaintiff's retaliatory dismissal claim, but rejected her sexual harassment claim as not being sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of her employment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Proposes Correction Program for Certain Unintentional, Operational Violations under Deferred Compensation Plans Subject to Section 409A</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_12-06-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_12-06-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-12-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-12-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Dec. 3 the IRS released Notice 2007-100, providing temporary correction methods for certain operational failures of non-qualified deferred compensation plans that would otherwise invoke the penalty taxes under Section 409A (&quot;Section 409A&quot;) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (California, which has enacted a parallel penalty tax may, in light of this notice, announce their own correction program).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 20, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=28"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=28</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Effective January 1, 2008, the minimum hourly rate for exempt computer software professionals will be $36, down from this year&amp;rsquo;s minimum of $49.77.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Extends Section 409A Remedial Amendment Period to December 31, 2008</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_10-22-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_10-22-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 22, 2007 the Internal Revenue Service (the &quot;IRS&quot;) issued much anticipated guidance in the form of Notice 2007-86 that extends the remedial amendment period with the final regulations under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A (&quot;Section 409A&quot;) from December 31, 2007 to December 31, 2008.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Disclosures to government regulators have always posed risks to trade secrets and other proprietary information.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: Stoneridge Investment Partners LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_10-10-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_10-10-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 9, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc., which centers on how wide a net plaintiffs may cast in securities class action suits.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 8, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=27"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=27</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a decision narrowing the scope of the administrative exemption, a California Court of Appeal held in Harris v. Superior Court that insurance claims adjusters were improperly classified under the administrative exemption because they performed &amp;quot;production&amp;quot; rather than administrative work.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>M&amp;A Developments-Deal Process and Protections (Netsmart, Lear and Topps)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/M&amp;A_Developments_Deal_Process.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/M&amp;A_Developments_Deal_Process.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-10-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-10-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Micro-cap public targets with limited analyst coverage and trading volume should conduct a pre-signing market check rather than relying on a post-signing market check, at least where a private equity buyer is involved.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Six Week Countdown for New Patent Rules: A Comprehensive Approach to Building Your Patent Portfolio Before and After November 1</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_video/New_Patent_Rules_09-19-07.html"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_video/New_Patent_Rules_09-19-07.html</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The United States Patent and Trademark Office [Office] is revising the rules of practice in patent cases relating to continuing applications and requests for continued examination practices, and for the examination of claims in patent applications.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Third Strike for Perfect 10?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Perfect10_CyberspLawyr_09-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Perfect10_CyberspLawyr_09-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In the Visa case, a divided panel held that processing payments for the infringing website services was too remote from the direct copyright infringements for Visa and other credit card company defendants to be held contributorily or vicariously liable.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Perfect 10 v. Google: Ninth Circuit Sanctions Web Site Framing, Online Thumbnail Displays</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Perfect10_v_Google_IPS.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Perfect10_v_Google_IPS.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>How fast do things change in &quot;Internet time&quot;? That was in substance one of the questions posed in a recent Ninth Circuit decision in Perfect 10 v. Google.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Extends Section 409A Amendment Period 1 Year, Announces Voluntary Correction Program Likely</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_09-11-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_09-11-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 10, 2007, the IRS issued final regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (&quot;Section 409A&quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 10, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=26"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=26</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court has provided guidance regarding the enforceability of a ban on class actions in employment arbitration agreements.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Second Quarter 2007)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=2"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=2</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 126 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Picture Perfect: Perfect 10 v. Visa</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Picture_Perfect.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Picture_Perfect.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In the 1940's, Jehovah's Witnesses, tenaciously litigious in defense of free expression, generated a half-dozen Supreme Court decisions that came to define First Amendment rights in the 20th century.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: Insider Trading Is Back</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_09-04-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_09-04-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-09-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Most of the SEC enforcement actions brought this year against Wall Street professionals and corporate executives involve insider trading in advance of mergers and acquisitions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Perspective: Patents, post-MedImmune</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Perspective_Patents_MedImmune.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Perspective_Patents_MedImmune.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-08-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Earlier this year, the Supreme Court shook the foundations of patent licensing and technology transfer, altering the balance of power between patent holders and their licensees and creating profound implications for the life-sciences industry.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: In re Seagate Technology, LLC&#8212;Willful Infringement and the Scope of Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-21-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-21-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-08-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 20, 2007, the Federal Circuit, sitting en banc, articulated a new standard for willful infringement: patentees must show at least objective recklessness.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Alert: New Rules for U.S. Patent Applications</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_08-21-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Alert_08-21-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-08-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Earlier today, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published new rules for patent prosecution.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Don't Try This on Your Site: Changing Contracts via Website Notice Alone</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Client_Alert_08-14-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Client_Alert_08-14-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 18, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Douglas v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 06-75424, which addressed whether a service provider may change the terms of its service contract by posting a revised contract on its website without providing additional notice.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Injunctions After eBay v. MercExchange</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Injunctions_After_eBay.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Injunctions_After_eBay.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>More than a year has passed since the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC, 126 S. Ct. 1837 (2006).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Integra LifeSciences I, Ltd. v. Merck KGaA&#8212;Applying the Supreme Court's Broad Interpretation of the FDA Exemption for Patent Infringement</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-30-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-30-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 27, the Federal Circuit in Integra LifeSciences v. Merck ruled on the Supreme Court's broad interpretation of the patent infringement exemption set forth in 35 U.S.C. &#167; 271(e)(1), for &quot;uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information&quot; to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Tax Alert: IRS Targeting Backdating Issue</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_07-23-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_07-23-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 11 the IRS released an internal Industry Director Directive memorandum dated June 15, 2007 (the &amp;quot;Directive&amp;quot;), which designates transactions involving backdated stock options as a &amp;quot;Tier I Issue&amp;quot; for IRS agents.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: No End of Trouble? Perfect 10 v. Visa International and Secondary Liability</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-17-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-17-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 3, 2007 the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Perfect 10 v. Visa International Service Association, No. 05-15170, which addressed the secondary liability of credit card companies, affiliated banks, and data processing services under copyright, trademark, and various state law claims for processing credit card payments for websites that allegedly infringe Perfect 10's copyright and trademark rights.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>New Patent Rules Looming: What Do They Mean for Your Portfolio?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/New_Patent_Rules_Looming.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/New_Patent_Rules_Looming.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The United States Patent &amp;amp; Trademark Office has proposed several sweeping new rules that will significantly alter how patent applications are treated.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Top Five Practices for Implementing an Effective Trade Secret Preservation Program</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Top_5_Practices.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Top_5_Practices.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Top Five Practices for Implementing an Effective Trade Secret Preservation Program.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Twombly and the Need to Plead Facts:The Antitrust Decision Every Litigator Needs to Know</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Twombly.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Twombly.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The foundation of any litigation is the complaint, and more specifically, the allegations made to support the plaintiff's claims.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: California Eases Rules for Stock Option Plans</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_07-11-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_07-11-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Effective July 9, 2007, California liberalized its regulations concerning the permissible provisions of stock option plans.  Practically every stock option plan of a privately-held company that has employees in California that participate in the plan can take advantage of this liberalization
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 10, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=25"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=25</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In an unusual decision specifically addressing a &quot;no-hire clause,&quot; a California appellate court articulated some guidelines as to the enforceability of such provisions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., Ltd. (Festo XIII) - Prosecution History Estoppel and the Foreseeability of Equivalents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-05-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-05-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-07-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-07-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 5, the Federal Circuit issued the latest in a line of decisions addressing the scope of prosecution history estoppel and its limits on the doctrine of equivalents, this time addressing whether an equivalent is foreseeable and thus subject to surrender.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Supreme Court Overrules Per Se Rule Against &quot;Vertical&quot; Minimum Price Agreements between Manufacturers and their Distributors</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_06-28-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_06-28-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 28, 2007, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc., No. 06-480, addressing the proper antitrust analysis of resale price maintenance under Section 1 of the Sherman Act, one of the most important federal antitrust statutes.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 23, 2007, Coca-Cola employee Joya Williams was sentenced to eight years in prison for trying to sell Coke's trade secrets to rival Pepsi.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: A Major Victory for Defendants in Securities Class Actions: Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues &amp; Rights, Ltd.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_06-21-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_06-21-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 21, 2007, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down a decision that provides welcome news to any public company, officer or director facing the prospect of a securities class action lawsuit.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>U.S. Supreme Court Reconciles Antitrust Law and Securities Regulation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_06-20-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_06-20-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On June 18, 2007, in Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC v. Billing, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important decision about the relationship between the federal antitrust laws and the federal securities laws
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 18, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=24"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=24</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a favorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court held that an employee's Title VII claim for sex discrimination  &#8212; based on allegations of unequal pay compared to her male peers - was untimely because she waited several years following the allegedly discriminatory acts to bring her claim.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>International Patent Strategy: Springboard to Going Global</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Int_Patent_Strategy.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Int_Patent_Strategy.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In today's global marketplace, patent protection continues to be an important part of a company's overall business and intellectual property strategy. However, protection provided by any one patent is limited to within the country in which it was granted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Playing by the Notice &amp; Takedown Rules: Protection for Online Service Providers</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/playing_by_notice.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/playing_by_notice.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This week the Federal Trade Commission obtained a $250,000 civil penalty against James Dondero, the operator of the Highland Capital hedge fund and a director of Motient Corporation, for making a late Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing in connection with his 2005 exercise of options to acquire 10,000 Motient shares.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update on Granting Stock Options in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Granting_Stock_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Granting_Stock_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is an overview of some of the legal and strategic issues related to a U.S. parent company granting stock options to employees of its Indian subsidiary, including consideration of exchange controls, securities laws and tax burdens.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: Beware of HSR Filing Requirements for Option Exercises or Vesting of Restricted Stock</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_05-24-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_05-24-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This week the Federal Trade Commission obtained a $250,000 civil penalty against James Dondero, the operator of the Highland Capital hedge fund and a director of Motient Corporation, for making a late Hart-Scott-Rodino Act filing in connection with his 2005 exercise of options to acquire 10,000 Motient shares.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (First Quarter 2007)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=1"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.12.1.asp?vid=1</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 117 companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Basics of Early Stage Legal_Issues &#8212; A Guide for Entrepreneurs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Basics_of_Early_Stage_Legal_Issues_-_Guide_for_Entrepreneurs.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Basics_of_Early_Stage_Legal_Issues_-_Guide_for_Entrepreneurs.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This guide was prepared for TiEcon 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Perfect 10 v. Google&#8212;Key Holdings: Website Framing Does Not  Directly Infringe the Public Display Right; Image Search Engine Thumbnails Are Fair Use; and a New Test for Online Contributory Infringement</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_05-17-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_05-17-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>How fast do things change in &quot;Internet time&quot;?  That was in substance one of the questions posed in yesterday's Ninth Circuit decision in Perfect 10 v. Google, which considered inter alia whether a less-than-four-year-old fair use precedent validating an image search engine had been overtaken by subsequent events.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Limits CDA Immunity for Internet Service Providers</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-17-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-17-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 15, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued an important decision affecting the scope of the safe haven under the Communications Decency Act (&quot;CDA&quot;) for internet service providers against liability for information created and provided by third parties.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Strategy and Best Practices for R&amp;D Services in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Stratgy_BP_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Stratgy_BP_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>China's Ministry of Commerce issued guidelines in March on attracting foreign investment in 2007.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - May 9, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=23"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=23</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employers with 100 or more employees and federal contractors with 50 or more employees must comply with new Employer Information Report (EEO-1) requirements, including a revised report form that must be used in 2007 and revised collection and reporting requirements for 2008.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.&#8212;Ordinary Innovation is Obvious</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2nd_Litigation_Alert_05-01-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/2nd_Litigation_Alert_05-01-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 30, the Supreme Court in KSR International v. Teleflex, announced that &quot;the results of ordinary innovation are not the subject of exclusive rights under the patent laws.&quot;
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Microsoft Corp. v. AT&amp;T Corp. &#8212; The Supreme Court Limits the Extraterritorial Effect of 35 U.S.C. &#167;&#160;271(f)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-01-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-01-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 30, the Supreme Court issued an important decision affecting liability for patent infringement for computer software developed in the United States and distributed abroad.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employment Law Alert: Payment for Missed Meal and Rest Periods Is a &quot;Wage&quot; Subject to Three-Year Statute of Limitations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=22"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=22</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a unanimous decision, the California Supreme Court held that the hour of pay to which non-exempt employees are entitled when they are denied a meal or rest period constitutes a wage, not a penalty.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Legal_FAQ_Patent_Law.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Legal_FAQ_Patent_Law.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent is a legal right to exclude others from practicing the patented invention for a limited period of time in exchange for disclosing the details of the invention to the public.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Legal FAQ: Introduction to Patent Litigation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Legal_FAQ_Patent_Litigation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Legal_FAQ_Patent_Litigation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office grants a patent. Contrary to popular belief, a patent does not give its holder the right to practice the invention, but the right to preclude others from practicing it.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: IRS Issues Final Regulations Under Section 409A</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_04-16-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_04-16-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 10, 2007, the IRS issued final regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (Section 409A).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Northern District of California Dismisses Shareholder Derivative Stock Options Backdating Case: In re CNET Networks, Inc., Shareholder Derivative Litig.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a detailed and thoughtful decision&amp;#8212;and one that is certain to be cited frequently in the months ahead&amp;#8212;Judge William Alsup has dismissed a shareholder derivative complaint against various officers and directors of CNET Networks, Inc...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: Northern District of California Dismisses Shareholder Derivative Stock Options Backdating Case: In re CNET Networks, Inc., Shareholder Derivative Litig.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_04-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a detailed and thoughtful decision&#8212;and one that is certain to be cited frequently in the months ahead ?  Judge William Alsup has dismissed a shareholder derivative complaint against various officers and directors of CNET Networks, Inc...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 11, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=21"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=21</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Cintas Corp. v. NLRB, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that an employer committed an unfair labor practice under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) by simply publishing its policy on confidentiality, even though the rule did not expressly forbid protected discussions nor was there evidence that the rule was used to prohibit protected activity.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-04-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-04-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court has ruled that patent licensees do not need to breach their license agreements before seeking a declaratory judgment in federal court that the underlying patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: Tellabs, Inc. et al. v. Makor Issues &amp; Rights, Ltd., et al.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_03-30-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_03-30-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 28, 2007, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Tellabs, Inc., et al. v. Makor Issues &amp; Rights, Ltd., et al., a case that promises to resolve a significant and long-standing disagreement among courts on interpretation of the requirement that plaintiffs in securities fraud actions plead a &quot;strong inference&quot; of scienter.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Establishing_Subsidiary_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Establishing_Subsidiary_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Businesses in the U.S. continue to move a portion of their development, support and other operations offshore to India, primarily for cost-saving reasons. Venture capital investors may require such outsourcing in order to reduce a company's burn rate.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: India Proposes that Employers Pay a 35% Tax on Stock-Related Compensation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_03-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_03-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Government of India's proposed budget for 2007-2008 (commencing April 1, 2007) includes extending the 35% fringe benefit tax imposed on employers to the income their employees in India recognize on exercise of compensatory stock options.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 12, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=20"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=20</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Walton v. U.S. Marshall Service, the Ninth Circuit clarified the legal standard for establishing a &quot;regarded as&quot; disability discrimination claim.  Naomi Walton, a court security guard, was terminated from her employment after failing to meet her employer's hearing standard.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Audio Home Recording Act Does Not Protect Device Distributor Against Copyright Claims Arising From Broadcaster Role</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/No_AHRA_Immunity.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/No_AHRA_Immunity.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a case of first impression, and one of the few cases interpreting the statute at issue, a New York district court held that the Audio Home Recording Act, 17 U.S.C. &amp;sect;&amp;sect; 1001 et seq.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Space-Shifting and Copyright: Can't Take it With You?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/CSUSA-NY_Space-Shifting.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/CSUSA-NY_Space-Shifting.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Issues arise in highly varied context involving different kinds of access to different kinds of content, provided through different technologies
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Audio Home Recording Act Does Not Protect Device Distributor Against Copyright Claims Arising From Broadcaster Role</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/No_AHRA_Immunity.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/No_AHRA_Immunity.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A New York district court held that the Audio Home Recording Act, 17 U.S.C. &#167;&#167; 1001 et seq. (&quot;AHRA&quot;), does not immunize a distributor of digital audio recording devices from copyright liability ...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Northern California District Court Expands Information Retention Requirements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-01-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_03-01-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has revised Civil Local Rule 16-9 and issued a new Standing Order for all Judges regarding the required contents of Joint Case Management Statements
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Space-Shifting and Copyright: Can't Take it With You? or No, No, They Can't Take That Away From Me</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/CSUSA-NY_Space-Shifting.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/CSUSA-NY_Space-Shifting.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Using Other Folks' (Copyrighted) Stuff on the Move: Issue Array
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to Structuring Venture Capital and Other Investments in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Structuring_VC_in_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Structuring_VC_in_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many U.S. and other foreign investors are evaluating alternatives for structuring investments into software development, business process outsourcing, drug discovery and other tech and non-tech companies based in India.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Imposes Limits on Punitive Damages Awards</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_02-23-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_02-23-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On February 20, 2007, Philip Morris won temporary reprieve when the Supreme Court vacated a jury award of $79.5 million in punitive damages to the widow of a deceased smoker, Jesse Williams.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Alert: The Supreme Court issued its decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., No. 05-381</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_02-21-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_02-21-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On February 20, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons Hardwood Lumber Co., No. 05-381, addressing the antitrust analysis of predatory bidding under Sherman Act Section 2.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Fourth Quarter 2006)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q406_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q406_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 113 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2006.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Securities Litigation Alert: First Delaware Decisions on Option Grant Dating: Ryan v. Gifford and In re Tyson Foods, Inc. Consol. Shareholder Litig.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_02-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/sec/Sec_Litigation_Alert_02-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In two separate decisions issued on February 6, the Delaware Chancery Court weighed in for the first time on issues directly relating to the current wave of stock option matters.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Tax Alert: IRS Program for Correcting Underwithholding of 409A Taxes on &quot;Backdated Options&quot;</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Tax_Alert_02-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Tax_Alert_02-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The IRS has announced a voluntary correction program (the &amp;quot;Program&amp;quot;) that employers can use to correct underwithholding of certain taxes incurred from the exercise in 2006 of &amp;quot;backdated options.&amp;quot;
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - February 7, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=19"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=19</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A California court of appeal recently clarified which kinds of conduct will support a hostile work environment harassment claim under California&amp;rsquo;s Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to Granting Stock Options in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This memorandum is an overview of the legal and strategic issues related to granting stock options in China, including understanding Chinese cultural views of employment and compensation, structuring option grants to comply with applicable Chinese currency controls and securities law restrictions and the tax consequences of options to the optionee.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Web Sites' CDA &#167;230 Immunity: An Ever-Expanding Universe?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/Dec06Privacy_website.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/EIM/Dec06Privacy_website.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Federal Communications Decency Act of 1996 (&quot;CDA&quot;) immunizes Web site operators and other interactive computer service providers from liability for third parties' tortious acts.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update: Raising the Initial Funding for High Technology Companies in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-02-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-02-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary of the process for raising initial funding in the Bay Area for high technology companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to  Investment and Operating in Restricted Industries in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>There are a number of business sectors in China such as telecommunications services, online commerce and advertising in which direct foreign investment is restricted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_China_2007.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_China_2007.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As China's strength in the global economy continues to grow, businesses need to consider the prospect of establishing operations within its borders.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>IP Law in China: Works for Hire</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Law_in_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Law_in_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The work made for hire (sometimes abbreviated to work for hire or &quot;WFH&quot;) doctrine is an exception to the general copyright rule that the person who actually creates a work is the legally-recognized author of that work.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Out of Sight, Out of Mind, Into Court</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Out_of_Sight.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Out_of_Sight.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Much has been written in recent years about the benefits and pitfalls associated with employee telecommuting arrangements.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2007 Update to Doing Business in China via the Cayman Islands</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Business_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2007_Update_Business_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many companies doing business in China are using a structure which includes a company formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands (&quot;CI&quot;).</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - New HSR Thresholds and Waiting Periods Effective February 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-16-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-16-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The dollar thresholds for pre-acquisition filings under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act will increase effective February 16 or 19, 2007 (depending on publication date), due to an annual adjustment mechanism that was created in the last round of amendments to the Act.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert - Supreme Court Knocks Down Federal Circuit Rule and Allows Licensees to Challenge a Licensed Patent</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-10-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-10-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled in MedImmune v. Genentech that a patent licensee does not need to breach its license agreement before seeking a declaratory judgment in federal court that the underlying patent is invalid, unenforceable, or not infringed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - SEC Adopts FAS 123R Practice for Disclosure of Share-Based Executive Compensation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-05-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-05-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>To close out 2006 the SEC has issued a welcome amendment of its Executive Compensation Disclosure Rules (adopted in July 2006) so that the calculation and reporting of the compensation from equity awards will be easier to compare with the values reported in the company's financial statements.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - January 2, 2007</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=18"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=18</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2007-01-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2007-01-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although employee misuse of the internet is still rife with potential liability for employers, a recent California appellate court decision reduces the risk, at least as to one potential source of liability.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Settlement Agreements Executed During Mediation Are Only Admissible If They Include Clear Language Demonstrating the Parties' Intent to be Bound</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-19-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-19-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-12-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 14, 2006, the California Supreme Court ruled in Fair v. Bakhtiari, No. S129220, ___ Cal.4th ___ (Dec. 14, 2006), that under California Evidence Code section 1123(b), parties who mediated their dispute and signed a settlement memorandum did not clearly demonstrate their intent that the memorandum be enforceable, even though it contained an arbitration clause.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: DOJ Revises Policy on Demanding Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-18-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-18-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 12, 2006, the Justice Department announced new guidelines for federal prosecutors to follow in charging business organizations.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: En Banc Federal Circuit Adopts Specific Intent Standard for Inducement</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-15-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_12-15-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Wednesday, December 13, 2006, the Federal Circuit resolved a split in authority over the standard for proving inducement of patent infringement.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - December 4, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=17"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=17</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-12-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-12-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The recent settlement of class action overtime lawsuits against IBM and Siebel confirm that the plaintiffs' bar has its sights set on the technology industry, with an aggressive attack on the historical treatment of most engineers and other technology workers as exempt from overtime compensation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: New Exemptions from DMCA Anti-Circumvention Rules Primarily Impact Narrowly Circumscribed Uses and Industries</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_11-28-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Alert_11-28-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Effective November 27, 2006, the Librarian of Congress announced the adoption of six exemptions to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act's (&quot;DMCA&quot;) anti-circumvention provision, the exemptions to apply for the next three years.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright/DMCA Developments</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Lit_1106.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Lit_1106.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The years 2005 and 2006 have seen a substantial group of decisions, including some cases of first impression that flesh out the law of primary and secondary liability, fair use, and various other copyright defenses, as well as further defining the application of the anti-circumvention and copyright management information provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2006.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2006.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The GNU General Public License v2.0 (&amp;quot;the GPL&amp;quot;) governs a majority of open source software. The GPL grants recipients the right to copy, distribute and modify covered software provided they do so in a manner consistent with the &amp;quot;free&amp;quot; nature of the software.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The California Supreme Court Considers Web Site Immunity</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Website_Immunity.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Website_Immunity.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court decided the Barrett v. Rosenthal case on Monday, November 20, 2006, holding that Section 230 provides immunity for distributor liability as well as publisher liability.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Third Quarter 2006)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q306_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q306_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 120 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2006.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Just Say ... Maybe (Arbitration Finality)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Maybe_recorder06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Maybe_recorder06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>&amp;quot;Three strikes you're out &amp;ndash; sort of.&amp;quot; That's what a California court has basically told a party that asked the court to overturn an arbitrator's award.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 6, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=16"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=16</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-11-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-11-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On October 10, 2006, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a disabled employee need not prove he was a &amp;quot;qualified&amp;quot; individual to demonstrate disability discrimination.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Beware the Dangers of Arbitrators Morphing Into Mediators</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Oct_WAMR_Beware.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Oct_WAMR_Beware.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Flexibility and adaptability are hallmarks of alternative dispute resolution, and the ability to fit procedures to the needs of the particular quarrel is often central to realizing the benefits of arbitration and mediation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Transforming Uses of a Celebrity's Likeness Are Protected by the First Amendment</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_10-31-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_10-31-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On September 25, 2006, the California Court of Appeal ruled in Kirby v. Sega of America, Inc., No. B183820 (Cal. Ct. App. Sept. 25, 2006), that the First Amendment provides a complete defense for misappropriation of a celebrity's likeness and image where the defendant's use is transformative
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Potential Defenses of Implied Patent License Under the GPL</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/potential_defenses.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/potential_defenses.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The GNU General Public License v2.0 (&quot;the GPL&quot;) governs a majority of open source software. The GPL grants recipients the right to copy, distribute, and modify covered software provided they do so in a manner consistent with the &quot;free&quot; nature of the software.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Early Stage Financing Term Sheets &#8212; Zero2IPO Workshop, Beijing, China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Zero2IPO_Early_Stage_Financing_Term_Sheets.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Zero2IPO_Early_Stage_Financing_Term_Sheets.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Assumes Caymans, BVI, US or other non-domestic China Corporation / Seed Financing Terms / Issues in China Venture Capital Deals / Venture Capital Financing Terms
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 17, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=15"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=15</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A California appellate court decision, Edwards v. Arthur Andersen, previously reported in the September 1, 2006, Fenwick Employment Alert, has stirred considerable debate within the employment law community about the enforceability of broad general release and covenant-not-to-sue provisions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Extension of Required 409A Compliance Date</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_10-05-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_10-05-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-10-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-10-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department issued Notice 2006-79 (the &amp;quot;Notice&amp;quot;) on October 4, 2006.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>D&amp;O Liability Insurance&#8212;Coverage Risks for Innocent Directors and Officers</title>
        <link href="Innocent directors and officers are at risk of losing D&amp;amp;O insurance coverage because of the knowledge or acts of other insureds."/>
        <id>Innocent directors and officers are at risk of losing D&amp;amp;O insurance coverage because of the knowledge or acts of other insureds.</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary></summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 25, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=14"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=14</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Strategix v. Infocrossing West, Inc., the court held that a nonsolicitation covenant prohibiting the seller of a business from soliciting all of the purchaser's employees and customers was overbroad and unenforceable.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: California Court of Appeal Rules Contractual Provisions to Submit Disputes to Judicial Referee Are Enforceable</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-18-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-18-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 21, 2006, the California Court of Appeal ruled in Woodside Homes of California Inc. v. Superior Court (Wheeler), 06 C.D.O.S. 7777, that pre-dispute contractual agreements to submit controversies to a judicial referee pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 6, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=13"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=13</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A recent decision by the Ninth Circuit emphasizes the importance of putting employees on notice that their computer and internet activity may be monitored.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Employment Law Alert: September 1, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-01-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-01-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A California appellate court expressly rejected a &quot;narrow restraint&quot; exception to California's non-compete statute, an exception relied on by federal courts to enforce non-competes against California employees where the restraint excludes an employee from a narrow portion of his or her profession.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: California Court Rejects &quot;Narrow Restraint&quot; Exception to State's Prohibition on Non-Compete Agreements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-01-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_09-01-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-09-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A California appellate court expressly rejected a &quot;narrow restraint&quot; exception to California's non-compete statute, an exception relied on by federal courts to enforce noncompetes against California employees where the restraint excludes an employee from a narrow portion of his or her profession..
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - SEC Adopts Sweeping Changes to Executive and Director Compensation Disclosure Rules</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-22-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-22-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 26, 2006, the SEC adopted sweeping changes to its rules for disclosing compensation of executive officers and directors of public companies, information about related person transactions, director independence and other corporate governance matters.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Northern District of California Rules Online Auction Buyer Must Sue in Seller's Forum</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-18-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-18-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recently, Chief Judge Vaughn Walker of the Northern District of California ruled in Boschetto v. Hansing (Case No. C-06-1390, order issued July 13, 2006) that a Wisconsin resident's sale of a vehicle on eBay to a California resident did not give rise to personal jurisdiction in California.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 17, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=12"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=12</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-08-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-08-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court recently concluded that the &quot;at will&quot; doctrine is alive and well in California.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Don't Try This on Your Site: Changing Contracts via Website Notice Alone</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Client_Alert_08-14-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Client_Alert_08-14-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-08-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 18, 2007, the Ninth Circuit issued its decision in Douglas v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 06-75424, which addressed whether a service provider may change the terms of its service contract by posting a revised contract on its website without providing additional notice.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Second Quarter 2006)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q206_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q206_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-08-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-08-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 90 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2006.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Beware the Dangers of Arbitrators Morphing Into Mediators</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Beware.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Beware.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Flexibility and adaptability are hallmarks of alternative dispute resolution, and the ability to fit procedures to the needs of the particular quarrel is often central to realizing the benefits of arbitration and mediation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Notable New Cases in Copyright/ DMCA Litigation (2005-2006)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Notable.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Notable.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The year 2005-06 has seen a substantial group of decisions&amp;#8212;including some cases of first impression&amp;#8212;that flesh out the law of primary and secondary liability, fair use and various other copyright defenses, as well as further defining the application of the anti-circumvention and copyright management information provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Court Shifts Balance Between Trade Secrets and Public Interest</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/trade_secrets_public.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/trade_secrets_public.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Are all trade secrets equally deserving of relevant discovery to enforce their protection? Not if the confidential business information is sufficiently &quot;newsworthy,&quot; and thus infused with public interest, according to a recent decision by the Sixth District of the California Court of Appeal. O'Grady v. Superior Court, 139 Cal.App.4th 1423 (2006).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 26, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=11"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=11</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In an unfavorable decision for employers, the U.S. Supreme Court held that adverse actions which do not cause tangible economic harm to employees may nevertheless constitute retaliation in violation of Title VII.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Ninth Circuit Extends Sublicensing Rule to Trademark Licenses</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-25-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-25-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 19, 2006, the Ninth Circuit held in Miller v. Glenn Miller Productions, Inc., No. 04-55874 (9th Cir. 2006) that a licensee of trademark and related publicity rights does not have the right to sublicense those rights to third parties without the licensor's express permission.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Supreme Court of California Holds Proposition 64 Applicable to Pending Unfair Competition Law Cases</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-24-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-24-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In November 2004, California voters passed Proposition 64 to purge the abusive use of private &quot;representative&quot; actions under California's Unfair Competition Law (&quot;UCL&quot;) and False Advertising Law (&quot;FAL&quot;) (respectively, California Business &amp; Professions Code Sections 17200 and 17500, et seq.).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert - New Prop 64 Decision Affects Class Actions Under California's Unfair Competition Law: Pfizer Inc. v. Superior Court</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-14-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-14-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Under the California Court of Appeal's July 11, 2006 decision in Pfizer Inc. v. Superior Court, class action plaintiffs seeking to bring unfair business practices or false advertising claims against California businesses now face a greater preemptive challenge.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: LG Electronics, Inc. v. Bizcom Electronics, Inc.</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-11-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-11-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 7, 2006, the Federal Circuit ruled in the case of LG Electronics, Inc. v. Bizcom Electronics, Inc., Civ. 05-1261, that a license agreement that disclaimed an implied license may also establish a conditional sale, thus defeating the application of patent exhaustion.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2006 Update to Structuring Venture Capital and Other Investments in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Structuring_VC.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Structuring_VC.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-07-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many U.S. and other foreign investors are evaluating alternatives for investments into software development, business process outsourcing, drug discovery and other services companies based in India.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2006.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2006.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent gives its owner the right to exclude others from making, using and selling the claimed invention. Thus, patent rights give a patentee great control over who uses his or her invention.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Dismisses LabCorp Appeal</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-23-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-23-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-06-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-06-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The U.S. Supreme Court yesterday opted to dismiss a case having potentially broad implications for the question of what constitutes patentable subject matter.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 12, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=10"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=10</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-06-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-06-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In Estee Lauder Co. v. Batra, a federal district court judge in New York granted a preliminary injunction against a former Estee Lauder senior executive who allegedly breached his noncompete agreement by taking a job with a rival cosmetics maker.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert - California Court Blocks Subpoenas Aimed at Bloggers' Source of Trade Secret Information</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-01-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_06-01-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On May 26, 2006, the California Court of Appeals, Sixth District, issued a unanimous decision striking down subpoenas to Internet &quot;news&quot; sites seeking the source of leaked trade secret information.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (First Quarter 2006)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q106_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q106_VC_Terms_Survey_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-05-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 101 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2006.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Going to the Videotape: An Introduction to the Patent System</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Going_to_Videotape.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Going_to_Videotape.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-05-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Patentees enter every jury trial with one distinct advantage: an official, ribboned copy of the patent at issue in the case. This trial exhibit comes embossed with the seal of the Patent and Trademark Office and signed by the director of that office.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: eBay v. MercExchange: Supreme Court Clarifies Test for Permanent Injunction in Patent Cases</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-15-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_05-15-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-05-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A decision today by the United States Supreme Court is likely to impact the dynamic in many patent litigation lawsuits brought by companies that purchase patents in order to sue other companies for infringing them.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - May 10, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=9"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=9</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-05-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-05-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous decision holding that three writers for the sitcom &quot;Friends&quot; did not sexually harass their former assistant, even though the assistant was exposed to coarse sexual humor during brainstorming sessions in which potential...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2006 Update to Granting Stock Options in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Granting_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Granting_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-05-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-05-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is an overview of the legal and strategic issues related to a U.S. parent company granting stock options to employees of its Indian subsidiary, including consideration of exchange controls, securities laws and obtaining possible tax benefits for an optionee.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Electronic Discovery is Focus of Pending Federal Rule Changes Approved by U.S. Supreme Court</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-25-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-25-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 12, 2006, the United States Supreme Court approved changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that will require early involvement of the court in managing electronic discovery.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Rights and Open Source&#8212;Can They Co-exist?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Rights.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Rights.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A patent gives its owner the right to exclude others from making, using, and selling the claimed invention. Thus, patent rights give a patentee great control over who uses his invention.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: District Court Rules that Shrinkwrap Agreement May Be Enforceable</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-21-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_04-21-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On April 5, 2006, the District Court for the Eastern District of California ruled in the case of Meridian Project Systems, Inc. v. Hardin Construction Co., L.L.C., Civ.04-2728, that an End User License Agreement (&quot;EULA&quot;) contained within software packaging may be an enforceable &quot;shrinkwrap&quot; agreement.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fair Use Palooza&#8212;The Supreme Court's KP Permanent Decision Opens a Can of Worms</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/fair_use_palooza.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/fair_use_palooza.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Statutory, or classic &quot;fair use&quot;&amp;#8212;the use, other than as trademarks, of common words, in their ordinary descriptive sense&amp;#8212;has long been a seemingly straightforward, not particularly controversial aspect of trademark law.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trade Secret Identification Rule</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Trade_Secret_ID_Rule.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Trade_Secret_ID_Rule.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Trade secret misappropriation litigation presents a paradox.  To mount a defense, a defendant must be apprised of what the plaintiff asserts was misappropriated.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Comments on the SEC's Proposed Changes to Executive Compensation and Related Party Disclosure Requirements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Comp_Disclosure_Analysis.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Comp_Disclosure_Analysis.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Release requests comment as to changes that could be made to the proposal to avoid boilerplate disclosure in the proposed Compensation Disclosure and Analysis.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2006 Update to Doing Business in China via the Cayman Islands</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Business_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Business_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many companies doing business in China are using a structure which includes a company formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands (&quot;CI&quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Putting the &quot;Co&quot; in Development and Promotion: The New Biotech-Pharma Collaborations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Biotech_Pharma.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Biotech_Pharma.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-04-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-04-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A number of strategic reasons exist for partnering among life sciences companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>USA PATRIOT Act Impasse: E-mail Interception Rules Need Congressional Attention, Too</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Privacy_0306_LJN.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Privacy_0306_LJN.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> When, if ever, can your Internet Service Provider (&amp;quot;ISP&amp;quot;) legally intercept and read your e-mail? Nearly anytime, according to almost every federal court that has tackled the issue.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2005 Trends in Life Sciences Partnering and Collaborations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/2005_Trends_Partnering.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/2005_Trends_Partnering.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Ten years ago, when a biotech company needed to raise capital, the avenue most frequently sought was the capital markets. Today, rising drug development costs can approach $1 billion, making a biotech's need for capital more intense than ever.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 27, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=8"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=8</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In August 2005, we reported on the California Supreme Court's ruling in Reynolds v. Bement, where the court held that corporate officers and directors were not personally liable under state wage/hour laws for overtime obligations.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Fourth Quarter 2005)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q4_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q4_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 100 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the fourth quarter of 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2006 Update to Granting Stock Options in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Update_Stock_Options_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This memorandum is an overview of the legal and strategic issues related to granting stock options in China, including understanding Chinese cultural views of employment and compensation, structuring option grants to comply with applicable Chinese currency...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2005 Takes Actual Dilution To Task</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Dilution.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Dilution.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Three years ago, in Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue, Inc., 537 U.S. 418 (2003) (&quot;Victoria's Secret&quot;), the Supreme Court held that the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1995...
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2005/2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_0506.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_0506.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In today's global marketplace, patent protection continues to be an important part of a company's overall business and intellectual property strategy. However, protection provided by any one patent is limited to within the country in which it was granted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Legal Issues for Entrepreneurs - Formation and Founders Issues</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Formation_and_Founders_Issues.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Formation_and_Founders_Issues.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This guide describes certain basic considerations and costs involved in forming a Delaware or California corporation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation Alert: India Proposes that Employers Pay a 35% Tax on Stock-Related Compensation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_03-12-07.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu_Comp_03-12-07.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Government of India's proposed budget for 2007-2008 (commencing April 1, 2007) includes extending the 35% fringe benefit tax imposed on employers to the income their employees in India recognize on exercise of compensatory stock options.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Determining Filing Deadlines for Periodic Reports</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_03-10-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_03-10-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In December 2005, the SEC adopted new filing deadlines for Forms 10-K and 10-Q, creating three tiers of filing deadlines based upon the filing company&amp;rsquo;s market capitalization.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 9, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=7"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=7</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> The U.S. Supreme Court recently held that a manager's occasional use of the word &quot;boy&quot; to refer to African-American employees may constitute sufficient evidence of race discrimination.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Life Sciences Companies Face Special Disclosure Challenges</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Disclosure_Issues.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/LifeSciences/Disclosure_Issues.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Life sciences companies face difficult disclosure issues because they operate in a particularly complex and financially sensitive regulatory environment.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Update - Supreme Court Eliminates Presumption of Market Power in Patent Tying Cases</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_03-06-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_03-06-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 1, 2006, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Illinois Tool Works, Inc. v. Independent Ink, which considered the long-standing presumption of market power in patent tying cases.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Update - Texaco v. Dagher: U.S. Supreme Court Provides Guidance on Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_03-01-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Antitrust_03-01-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-03-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Supreme Court's decision on February 28, 2006, in Texaco, Inc. v. Dagher provides important and much-needed guidance for the antitrust analysis of joint ventures.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Perfect 10 v. Google - Analysis of the Preliminary Injunction Decision</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/GroksterDecison/perfect10_google.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/GroksterDecison/perfect10_google.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Order Granting/Denying Preliminary Injunction (Feb. 21, 2006). Key Holdings&amp;#8212;Thumbnail copying for search purposes not fair use, notwithstanding Kelly v. Arriba Soft. No contributory liability.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>What Now After Grokster?</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/GroksterDecison/what_now_grokster.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/GroksterDecison/what_now_grokster.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> &#8220;We hold that one who distributes a device with the object of promoting its use to infringe copyright, as shown by clear expression of other affirmative steps taken to foster infringement, is liable for the resulting acts of infringement by third parties.&#8221;
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - February 23, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=6"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=6</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On appeal, a Virginia federal judge recently refused to enforce a Labor Department administrative law judge's order reinstating the first plaintiff to bring a successful claim under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act's whistleblower protections.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Perfect 10's Preliminary Injunction Against Google Exposes New Approaches to Copyright and Fair Use on the Internet</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_02-22-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_02-22-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On February 21, 2006, the Federal District Court in Los Angeles issued a decision with important new analyses affecting use of copyrighted materials on the Internet.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Basics - Just Enough Copyright Law If You Are Not an Attorney or IP Expert</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Basics.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Basics.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Copyright refers to the rights of authors in works of authorship &amp;#8212; as distinguished from patents (whose subject matter is inventions), trademarks (which concern symbols of an enterprise's reputation and goodwill) and trade secrets (information whose value derives from being kept secret).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - SEC Rule Proposal Creates Current Action Items</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_02-14-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_02-14-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As we described in previous alerts, the SEC has proposed sweeping new rules governing public company disclosure of executive and director compensation arrangements and related party transactions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Circuit Court Decisions Weaken, Strengthen Hand of Software Owners Using Technological Protection Measures</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Circuit_Court.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Circuit_Court.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Within one late summer week, two federal courts of appeals rendered decisions that will have a significant effect on the rights of copyright holders.  In both cases, third parties had overcome password schemes that software owners employed to protect their works from use by unauthorized parties.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - February 8, 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=5"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=5</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In recent weeks, three separate California courts of appeal have weighed in on the question of whether the one hour of pay to which an employee is entitled when he or she is denied a meal period constitutes a wage payment or a penalty.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trademark Selection and Protection for High Technology Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TM_Selection_for_HighTech.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/TM_Selection_for_HighTech.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-02-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Among a company's most valuable assets are the symbols by which that company and its products or services are known to the public.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - SEC Proposes New Rules for Executive Compensation Disclosure&#8212;The Details Emerge</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-31-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-31-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-31T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-31T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The SEC has now made available the text of its rule proposals covering executive compensation and related party transaction disclosure.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: California Court Enforces Liquidated Damages in Standardized Form Contracts for Consumer Services</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-27-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-27-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> On January 20, 2006, a California Court of Appeal found enforceable the liquidated damages provisions for late fees in standardized form contracts for consumer services.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - M&amp;A Development: SEC Proposes to Amend Tender Offer Best-Price Rule</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-24-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-24-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In recent years cash mergers have been used more frequently than cash tender offers, in part due to concerns that target employment, severance or other compensatory arrangements might be deemed to violate the SEC's &amp;quot;best-price&amp;quot; rule, requiring that equal consideration be paid to all tendering security holders.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2006 Update to Structuring Venture Capital and Other Investments in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Structuring_VC.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/2006_Structuring_VC.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many U.S. and other foreign investors are evaluating alternatives for investments into software development, business process outsourcing, drug discovery and other services companies based in India.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>eBay v. MercExchange - Supreme Court to Reconsider Injunction Remedy in Patent Cases</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/eBay_MercExchange.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/eBay_MercExchange.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The U.S. Supreme Court will soon reconsider the long-lived standards for granting permanent injunctions in patent infringement cases in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange L.L.C., 401 F.3d 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Recent Developments in Majority Voting for Directors</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-19-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-19-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Over the past year, the concept that majority votes should be required for the election of corporate directors has emerged as one of the top issues being focused upon by investors, public company boards and shareholder advisory firms.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>International Patent Strategy</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Int_Patent_Strategy.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Int_Patent_Strategy.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In today's global marketplace, patent protection continues to be an important part of a company's overall business and intellectual property strategy.  However, protection provided by any one patent is limited to within the country in which it was granted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Law Developments: 2006</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2006.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2006.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Year Past and the Year Ahead
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - SEC Proposes New Rules for Executive Compensation Disclosure</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-18-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-18-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>At its open meeting yesterday, January 17, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved for comment sweeping new rule proposals that would dramatically alter many public company disclosure practices.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: New Price Discrimination Case from the Supreme Court</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-18-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-18-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Despite academic criticism and increasingly rare government enforcement, reports of the death of the Robinson-Patman Act are premature, and price discrimination continues to be a potential source of private litigation for many companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - New Compensation and Other Disclosure Requirements Expected</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-09-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_01-09-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On Tuesday, January 17, 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting to consider proposing major changes to public company disclosures of compensation and governance information.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - Notice 2006-4: Interim Guidance on Private Company Stock Valuation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-09-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-09-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 23, 2004, the IRS issued interim guidance in the form of Notice 2006-4 regarding stock valuation for privately-held companies pending the finalization of the proposed regulations under Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Litigation Alert: Inefficient Electronic Discovery Management Can Cost Clients</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-04-06.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_01-04-06.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 14, 2005, the Delaware Chancery Court reduced recovery of plaintiffs' attorneys' fees in a securities case by nearly $1.2 million, in large part for inefficiently managing electronic discovery.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>University Licensing: An Introduction to Licensing Technology from Universities</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/university_licensing.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/university_licensing.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2006-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2006-01-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> What do Yamaha synthesizers, gene splicing and DSL have in common? They are all based on technology licensed from universities. As these examples show, universities often develop and license new cutting edge technologies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Antitrust Issues of  Particular Relevance to High-Technology Industries</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/US_High_Technology.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/US_High_Technology.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-12-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-12-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Not that long ago, there was a relatively widespread belief among executives in high-technology companies that, because of the unique characteristics of high-technology industries, the antitrust laws had little, if any, application to them or their businesses.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 29, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=4"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=4</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> The California Court of Appeal recently ruled that, although an employer may ordinarily refuse to communicate through an employee's attorney during the interactive process to reasonably accommodate an employee's disability, in some limited circumstances the employer may need to communicate with an employee's attorney.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Third Quarter 2005)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q3_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q3_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 100 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the third quarter of 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 22, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=3"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=3</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary> The U.S. Supreme Court held in IBP v. Alvarez that, under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, an employee&amp;rsquo;s work time at a meat packing plant included time spent walking to an employee&amp;rsquo;s workstation after changing into protective gear.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2005.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2005.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On November 7, 2005, the Recording Industry Association of America issued a press release announcing settlement of the longstanding file-sharing dispute with Grokster.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - 409A Action Steps to Take Prior to December 31, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-15-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_11-15-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In late 2004 the IRS released Notice 2005-1 (the &quot;Notice&quot;) which provided initial guidance on then newly enacted IRC Section 409A.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Follow-on Biological Products&#8212;Legal Issues</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/follow-on.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/follow-on.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many biologics, including blockbusters like Epogen/Procrit, are nearing patent expiration, and generics manufacturers, including Sicor (acquired by Teva), Barr Laboratories, and Ivax Corporation, are hoping to market generic biologics.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Authorized Generics: Antitrust Issues and the Hatch-Waxman Act</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Authorized_Generics.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Authorized_Generics.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>An  authorized generic (AG) is a  pharmaceutical product  that was originally  marketed and sold by a  brand company, but  is relabeled and marketed under a  generic product  name.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 27, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=1"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/publications/6.5.4.asp?mid=1</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The decision by a 3-judge panel of the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals that FMLA releases must be approved by a court or the federal Department of Labor
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Protection for High Technology Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Protection.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Protection.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Intellectual property is the term used to describe the intangible assets associated with a company's technological innovation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - Internal Revenue Code Section 409A: Severance Guidance</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_10-24-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_10-24-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-24T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-24T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary addressing severance compensation (and certain restricted stock unit payments upon termination of employment) in the context of Section 409A and the Proposed Regulations.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Litigation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Patent_Litigation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Patent_Litigation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This booklet is designed for those who wish to enforce their patents or who are accused of infringing another's patent. It provides an outline of patent law in the United States, and an overview of the procedure of patent cases.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Deal Points for Gaming Negotiation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Deal_Points_10-11-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Deal_Points_10-11-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Often pitted against robust publishing companies, independent video game development studios face many challenges when entering into negotiations for video game development and publishing deals.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>What Employers Should Know and Do About Blogs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/labor_employment_bulletin_1005.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/labor_employment_bulletin_1005.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-10-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-10-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>With the proliferation of weblogs or &quot;blogs,&quot; companies find themselves faced with a new forum for employee conduct that poses both risks and rewards.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Sweeping New Rules Apply to Securities Offerings by Technology and Life Science Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_09-30-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_09-30-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A major modernization of federal regulations that apply to registered securities offerings takes effect December 1, 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update&#8212;Publication of IRC Section 409A Proposed Regulations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-30-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-30-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On September 29, 2005, the Treasury Department released the much anticipated Proposed Regulations to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the &amp;quot;Proposed Regulations&amp;quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update&#8212;Publication of IRC Section 409A Proposed Regulations</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-30-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-30-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On September 29, 2005, the Treasury Department released the much anticipated Proposed Regulations to Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code (the &amp;quot;Proposed Regulations&amp;quot;).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Good News for Potential IPOs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_09-29-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Corp_Sec_09-29-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Late last week the SEC announced the extension of compliance dates for Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 reports by non-accelerated filers until their first fiscal year ending after July 15, 2007.  This is welcome news for smaller public companies. In addition, the announcement has special significance for private companies contemplating the possibility of an initial public offering within the next 15 months.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 26, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-26-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-26-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court recently held that an employee&amp;rsquo;s refusal to follow a supervisor&amp;rsquo;s order that the employee reasonably believes is discriminatory&amp;#8212; even absent a formal complaint&amp;#8212;is a protected activity under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) that can serve as the basis for a retaliation claim.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Extraterritorial Expansion of U.S. Patent Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Law_09-20-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Law_09-20-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>With the advent of the global economy, the design, manufacturing, marketing, and sales activities of businesses are being performed increasingly overseas. Naturally, the owners of U.S. patents are increasingly attempting to enforce their U.S. patents against activities carried out at least in part, if not entirely, outside the U.S.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - Now We Are Making Sense &#8212; Revised Grant Date Rulesfor Options</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-19-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_09-19-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>At a meeting earlier this year, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (&amp;ldquo;FASB&amp;rdquo;) announced that, pursuant to FAS Statement 123(R), the grant date of an option would not occur until the employee had been notified of the material terms of the option grant.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Alert: Circuit Court Decisions Weaken, Strengthen Hand of Software Owners Using Technological Protection Measures</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Alert_09-15-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Copyright_Alert_09-15-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Within one late summer week, two federal courts of appeals rendered decisions that will have a significant effect on the rights of copyright holders.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Second Quarter 2005)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q2_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q2_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 92 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Strategic Intellectual Property Planning</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Strategic_IP_Planning.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Strategic_IP_Planning.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The recognition of intellectual property as an intellectual asset, and an asset generally, is paramount to successful strategic intellectual property planning. Intellectual property should be thought of as having the characteristics of an asset, and should be so managed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - California Supreme Court Decision Reduces Risk of Personal Unpaid Wage Liability for Officers and Directors of Troubled Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-22-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-22-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Labor Code provides employees with a private right of action to recover unpaid wages against their employer. However, the relevant provisions of the Labor Code do not define who is an &amp;quot;employer.&amp;quot;
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Intellectual Property Audit</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Audit.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Audit.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Intellectual property has an importance today greater than ever before.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - New Accounting Valuation Rules for Option Grants &#8212; Definition of Grant Date</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-18-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-18-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Under FAS Statement 123(R) options granted to employees are valued based on their fair value as of the &amp;quot;grant date&amp;quot; of the option.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits Update - New Accounting Valuation Rules for Option Grants&#8212;Definition of Grant Date</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-18-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_08-18-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Under FAS Statement 123(R) options granted to employees are valued based on their fair value as of the &amp;quot;grant date&amp;quot; of the option.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>'Grokster' Seems Unlikely to Prevent File Sharing by Itself</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Grokster_0805.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Grokster_0805.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Once the enabling software had proliferated sufficiently, nothing Grokster could do could stop its operation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Law Alert: California Supreme Court Rules that Officers and Directors are not Personally Liable in Overtime Cases</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/ELA_08-12-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/ELA_08-12-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In an important victory for California officers, directors and managers, on August 11, 2005, the California Supreme Court held such individuals are not personally liable to employees for unpaid overtime.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Pre-Dispute Contractual Waivers of Trial by Jury Ruled Unenforceable under California Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-10-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-10-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Contract Language / The Decision / Arbitration Agreements / Practical Impact
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 8, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-08-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-08-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Relations With Subordinates May Create Hostile Environment / Discrimination in Attempting to &quot;Westernize&quot; Employee's Name / Failure to Stop Customer Harassment / $20 Million Verdict in Age Bias Case / 401(k) Documentation / Mandatory Harassment Training
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Pre-Dispute Contractual Waivers of Trial by Jury Ruled Unenforceable under California Law</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-08-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_08-08-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Contract Language / The Decision / Arbitration Agreements / Practical Impact
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Section 16 Update</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-04-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-04-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-08-04T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-08-04T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 3, 2005, the SEC adopted long awaited amendments to Rules 16b-3 and 16b-7 under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 25, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-25-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-25-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>California Court Authorizes Partial-day PTO Deductions for Exempt Workers
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 20, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-20-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-20-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Vertigo Not a Disability under ADA/ Same-actor Inference Defeats National Origin Discrimination Claim/ Lack of Notice Defeats FMLA Claim/ Independent Contractor May State Unruh Act Discrimination Claim/ Meal or Rest Period Violations Penalty Clarified
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Infringement Under Section 271(f) and the Exportation of Software&#8212;Living in a Material World</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-19-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-19-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On July 13, 2005, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an opinion regarding whether the exportation of software code from the United States for distribution and use in foreign markets constitutes an infringement under U.S. patent law.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Phillips v. AWH Corporation&#8212;Revisiting the Rules of Claim Construction: Still No Magic Formula</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-13-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-13-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Overview / Commentary / Authors of the Opinion / Summary of the Opinion / Dissents
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 12, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-12-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-12-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Labor Commissioner Reconsiders Position on Partial Day Vacation Deductions / Criticisms of Employee's Performance do not Support FEHA Claim / NLRB Strikes Down Handbook Provision Limiting Employee Complaints / Employer's Failure to Post Notice May Excuse Late EEOC Filing / Abercrombie &amp; Fitch Agrees to Settle Class Action
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>California Supreme Court Clarifies Guidelines for Punitive Damages</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-05-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/Litigation_Alert_07-05-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-07-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-07-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The California Supreme Court has clarified the guidelines for imposition of punitive damages in Simon v. San Paolo U.S. Holding Co. and Johnson v. Ford Motor Co.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 22, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_06-22-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_06-22-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employer's Use of &quot;Personality&quot; Test Violated ADA/ Decision Highlights Risk of Using E-Mail to Distribute Important Personnel Policies/ Ninth Circuit Will Reconsider Casino's Requirement that Women Bartenders Wear Makeup/ Hospital Settles Wage/Hour Class Action for $4.75 Million
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Start-up Legal Resource Guide: Prepared for the TiE Early Stage Financing Workshop</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Start-up_Legal_Resource_Guide.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Start-up_Legal_Resource_Guide.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Seed and VC Financing / Sample Series A Term Sheet / VC for High Tech Companies / Raising Initial Funding in the San Francisco Bay Area / Venture Financing Terms Survey - 1st Quarter 2005 / &quot;Shaking the Money Tree&quot; / Patent Portfolio Strategy for Start-ups
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>CoStar Reopens Settled Fixation Issue in Online Digital Environment</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/CoStar_Reopens.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/CoStar_Reopens.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>[T]he U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit undermined a previously unbroken line of cases holding that electronic copies of digital works are &quot;fixed&quot; within the meaning of the Copyright Act if they exist in the random access memory (RAM) of a computer.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Spring 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2005.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Spring_2005.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>CoStar Reopens Settled Fixation Issue/Trademark Infringement and the Fair Use Defense/Changes in Store for &quot;Ailing&quot; Patent System/Family Entertainment and Copyright Act Becomes Law.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trademark Infringement and the Fair Use Defense</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Infringmnt_and_Fair_Use.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Trademark_Infringmnt_and_Fair_Use.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In a December 8, 2004, decision, the Supreme Court resolved a split in the appellate courts on the significance of likelihood of confusion in a fair use defense to a trademark infringement claim.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Typosquatting and the Duty to Police Infringing Trademarks</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Strategist_0605.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/IP_Strategist_0605.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Initial Interest Confusion and 'Post-Initial Confusion'.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Corporate and Securities Law Update - Regulation FD Enforcement Actions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_05-24-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_05-24-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This memorandum summarizes the fact patterns of actions to present the application of Regulation FD in practical terms.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Correct Inventorship Prevents Patent Application Headaches</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Correct_Inventorship.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Correct_Inventorship.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Although companies race to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office to build their patent portfolios, technically, a company is not granted a patent.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Changes in Store for &quot;Ailing&quot; Patent System</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Ailing_Patent_System.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Ailing_Patent_System.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Just a few years ago, it was unusual for patents to make newspaper headlines&amp;#8212;but times have changed.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (First Quarter 2005)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q1_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q1_05_VC_Survey_Trends_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 89 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the first quarter of 2005.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Watch Out For Statutory Bars &#8212; Don't Lose Your Patent Rights Before You Even File The Application</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Statutory_Bars_Patent_Rights.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Statutory_Bars_Patent_Rights.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-05-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many people are aware of the need to keep patentable inventions secret. However, few people other than patent lawyers understand the reasons for the secrecy, or know the other actions that might cause an inventor to unintentionally lose the right to obtain a patent.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 26, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_04-26-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_04-26-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-04-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-04-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>California Issues Newly Revised Meal Break Rules/ No Strict Liability Under FMLA For Employee Engaged In Disruptive Workplace Behavior/ Employer Liable For Discharging Returning Veteran/ San Jose Jury Awards Over $2 Million In Co-worker Sex Harassment Case
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Recent Mergers and Acquisitions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/M&amp;A_List.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/M&amp;A_List.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>10 Acquisitions Announced and/or Closed in 2005: Combined Value in Excess of $4.5 B.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - April 14, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_04-14-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_04-14-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-04-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-04-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>U.S. Supreme Court Allows Disparate Impact Theory in Age Discrimination Cases/Employers May Not Require Medical Examination Before Making &quot;Real&quot; Job Offer
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Entrepreneur Workshop Series: Founders and Formation Issues</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Entrepreneur_Workshop.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Entrepreneur_Workshop.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-03-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-03-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Formation Issues and Considerations/Early Stage Issues/Pre-Financing Capitalization Structure/Typical Pre-Financing Capitalization Structure/Stock Options for Employees
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - March 2, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_03-02-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_03-02-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-03-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-03-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employer Lawfully Recovered Unearned Commission Advances/Employer's Stray Remarks about Age Enable Older Worker to Proceed to Trial on Discrimination Claim
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (Second Half of 2004)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_H2_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_H2_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for 63 Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in the second half of 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Patent Law Developments: 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Patent_Law_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-17T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-17T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The Year Past and the Year Ahead
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Software Escrows as Part of an Intellectual Property Strategy</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Software_Escrows.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Software_Escrows.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>For many companies, a key aspect of a comprehensive intellectual property strategy is to identify and enforce mechanisms to protect their investment in software purchased from software developers.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>As China's strength in the global economy continues to grow, businesses need to consider the prospect of establishing operations within its borders.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Recent Trends In Securities Litigation: Perspectives From Plaintiffs And Regulators</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/SecLit_Alert_02-14-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Litigation/SecLit_Alert_02-14-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The 2005 D&amp;O Liability and Insurance Symposium in New York, sponsored by the Professional Liability Underwriting Society, featured a panel of top plaintiffs' lawyers,
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>New, Severe California Penalties for Taxable Years Before January 1, 2003</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_02-10-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Tax/Tax_Alert_02-10-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Could your company owe income or sales and use taxes in California for tax years beginning prior to January 1, 2003?
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>InVision Non-Prosecution Agreement with DOJ and Proposed Settlement with SEC Demonstrate Importance of Compliance with Foreign Corrupt Practices Act</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_02-01-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_02-01-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-02-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-02-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On December 3, 2004, the U.S. Department of Justice entered into a non-prosecution agreement relating to a Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) investigation of InVision Technologies, Inc.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits - January 11, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-11-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_01-11-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-01-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-01-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Treasury Department Issues Guidance under IRC Section 409A in Notice 2005-1
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - January 10, 2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_01-10-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_01-10-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2005-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2005-01-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Ninth Circuit Permits Requirement that Women Bartenders Wear Makeup/Indefinite Leave of Absence Not A Reasonable Accommodation When Employee Unlikely to Return Within Reasonable Time
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2004&#8212;2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Trademarks on a Shoestring for Start-Ups/Circuit Courts Narrow the Reach of the DMCA's Anti-Circumvention Provisions/Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Winter 2004/2005</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Winter_04-05.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-12-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Trademarks on a Shoestring for Start-Ups/Circuit Courts Narrow the Reach of the DMCA's Anti-Circumvention Provisions/Quick Updates.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - December 15, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_12-15-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_12-15-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-12-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employees Who Resign from At-Will Employment May Recover Damages for Unfulfilled Promise of Future Employment/Employer Not Liable for &quot;Equal Opportunity&quot; Abuser
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - December 6, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_12-06-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_12-06-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-12-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-12-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>No Personal Liability for Co-Worker Harassment Committed Before 2001 Amendment/Conduct That Ridicules Both Sexes May Still Create a Hostile Work Environment
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SEC Issues FAQ Release on Form 8-K Filings</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-30-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-30-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The SEC Division of Corporation Finance issued a &quot;Frequently Asked Questions&quot; release on November 23, 2004, regarding the Current Report on Form 8-K rules that became effective August 23, 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Legal Structures for Outsourcing</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Outsourcing.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Outsourcing.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-29T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Business in the U.S. continue to shift a portion of their development, support and other operations offshore to countries, such as India or China, that offer a lower cost structure and a qualified labor pool.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>An Update on Structuring Venture Capital and Other Investments in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Investments_in_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Investments_in_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Many U.S. and other foreign investors are evaluating alternatives for investments into software development, business process outsourcing (&quot;BPO&quot;), drug discovery and other service companies in India.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>An Updated Guide to Establishing a Subsidiary in India</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_India.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Establishing_Subsidiary_in_India.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Businesses in the U.S. continue to move a portion of their development, support and other operations offshore to India, primarily for cost-saving reasons.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Strategy and Best Practices in China and India Life Sciences Business Transactions</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Strategy_&amp;_Practices.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/IP_Strategy_&amp;_Practices.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This paper is based on a presentation made at the Asia America Multitechnology Association (&quot;AAMA&quot;) Conference on October 8, 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (Second &amp; Third Quarters of 2004)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q2_2004_+_Q3_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q2_2004_+_Q3_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for 58 Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in the second and third quarters of 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Third Quarter 2004)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q304_VC_Terms_Report.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Q304_VC_Terms_Report.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 113 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the third quarter of 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - November 16, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_11-16-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_11-16-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Alert: Voters Curtail Plaintiffs' Lawyers' Ability to Launch Class Actions Against Business/Employers Hit with $650,000 and $1.8 Million Verdicts for Wrongful Termination
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Time to Consider Revising Compliance and Ethics Programs in Light of New Federal Sentencing Guidelines</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-16-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-16-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Recent amendments to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines applicable to organizations went into effect on November 1, 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>M&amp;A Development: Court Finds Financially Sophisticated Director Personally Liable for $77 Million</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-09-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-09-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-09T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-09T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The price and process fairness of business combinations are increasingly challenged in litigation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Proposed New &quot;Quiet Period&quot; Rules, Shelf Registration Procedures</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-03-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_11-03-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-03T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>SEC Proposes Rule Changes to Ease &quot;Quiet Period&quot; Restrictions and Change shelf Registration Procedures.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>The Interplay Between Standards Bodies and Patents</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Interplay.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Antitrust/Interplay.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-11-02T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-11-02T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Technical standards are often used to ensure that products from different companies will interoperate. Many of these standards are created by a standards body composed of companies interested in influencing the particular standard at hand.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits - October 26, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_10-26-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Execu-Comp_10-26-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-10-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-10-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Taxation of Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 26, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_10-26-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_10-26-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-10-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-10-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Disparate Impact Claim Fails Even Though Reorganization Primarily Displaced Workers in Protected Classes/Insubordination Triggered by Employer's Own Unlawful Conduct Cannot Justify Adverse Employment Action
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - October 11, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_10-11-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_10-11-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-10-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-10-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Fabrication Plant Workers Entitled to Wages for Donning and Doffing Clean Room Uniforms.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 27, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-27-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-27-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-27T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-27T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Discrimination Claims Not Released by Standard Form Workers' Compensation Release Agreement/Alleged Acts of Harassment Occurring Outside of the Actionable Time Period May Be Knitted Together with More Recent Incidents to Support Hostile Environment Claim
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings in Israel (First Half of 2004)</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q1_2004_+_Q2_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/VCSurvey/Israel_VC_Survey_Q1_2004_+_Q2_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We have analyzed the terms of venture financings for 50 Israeli and Israeli-related technology companies that reported raising money in the first half of 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Raising Initial Funding for High Technology Companies in the San Francisco Bay Area</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Raising_Initial_Funding.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This is a brief summary of the process for raising initial funding in the Bay Area for high technology companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Fall 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Fall_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Federal Circuit Whacks the Doctrine of Equivalents Again/The Role of Dictionaries in Patent Claim Construction/ Quick Updates.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - September 8, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-08-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_09-08-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-09-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-09-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>California Supreme Court Lowers the Bar for Wage and Hour Class Actions/Interference With At-Will Employment Requires Independently Wrongful Actions
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 30, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-30-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-30-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-08-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-08-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>California Court Refuses to Dismiss Retaliation Claim, Even Though Decision-Maker Was Unaware of the Terminated Employee's Protected Activity.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Trends in Legal Terms in Venture Financings In the San Francisco Bay Area (Second Quarter 2004)</title>
        <link href=""/>
        <id></id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-08-13T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-08-13T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>We analyzed the terms of venture financings for 112 technology companies headquartered in the San Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2004.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - August 10, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-10-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_08-10-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-08-10T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-08-10T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Gender Bias Lawsuit Settlements Result in Substantial Monetary and Non-Monetary Obligations for Boeing and Morgan Stanley.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Final Regulations on ISOs and ESPPs</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-06-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-06-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-08-06T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-08-06T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On August 2, 2004 the IRS published final regulations (the &quot;Final Regulations&quot;) on incentive stock options under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (the &quot;Code&quot;) and purchase rights under 423 of the Code (&quot;ISO&quot; and &quot;ESPP Right&quot; respectively, and &quot;SSOs&quot; collectively).
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>FAQ: Form 8-K Disclosure Requirements and Practical Implications for Technology Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-05-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_08-05-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-08-05T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Effective August 23, 2004, every public company must comply with new Form 8-K disclosure requirements.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief Special Update - July 28, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_7-28-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_7-28-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-07-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-07-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Special Update Re: Private Attorney General Act Developments.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Investment and Operating in Restricted Industries in China</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Invest_Operating_In_China.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-07-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>There are a number of business sectors in China such as telecommunications services, online commerce and advertising in which direct foreign investment is restricted.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Strategies for Getting Patents Issued Quickly</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Getting_Patent_Quickly.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Getting_Patent_Quickly.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-07-21T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>The competitive value of many Internet, business method, or software patents lies in functional features that are exposed when the invention is made commercially available.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 19, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-19-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-19-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-07-19T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Private Sector Employee Cannot Sue for Wrongful Discharge Based upon Alleged Violation of &quot;Free Speech&quot; Right/Former Employee Allowed to Pursue Claim for Wrongful Discharge for Complaining About Fraudulent Billing Practices
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - July 12, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-12-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/EB_07-12-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-07-12T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-07-12T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employer's Notice By Email of Mandatory Arbitration Policy Deemed Inadequate/Court Clarifies Scope of Marital Status Discrimination Claims
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Managing Innovation: University-industry partnerships and the licensing of the Harvard mouse</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Managing_Innovation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Managing_Innovation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>DuPont's Oncomouse patent licensing program continues to cause a stir in academia and industry.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Top 10 Recommendations for Creating Enforceable Online Agreements</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Top_10.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Top_10.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Because the law interpreting the enforceability of online agreements continues to evolve, companies that want to create binding agreements with their online customers still face significant challenges.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Fenwick Employment Brief - June 25, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-25-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-25-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-25T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-25T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>U.S. Supreme Court Recognizes Concept of Constructive Discharge in Title VII Cases/NLRB Reverse Itself: Non-Union Employees Now Not Entitled to Have Coworker Present at Disciplinary Interview
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - June 16, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-16-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-16-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>A Less Appealing Job Reassignment Does Not Constitute Adverse Action For Title VII Claim/Terminating Employee For Violation Of Harassment Policy Not Pretext For Religious Discrimination
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Assessing Patent Value</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Assessing_Patent_Value.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Assessing_Patent_Value.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Business decisions often depend upon accurately determining an asset's value.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Intellectual Property Bulletin Summer 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_bulletins/IP_Bulletin_Summer_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-15T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-15T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Lessons in Patent Prosecution Quality Control from the Federal Circuit/The Complex Legal Implications of Modifying Licensed Software/ Quick Updates
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - June 1, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-01-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_06-01-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-06-01T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Court Sends Case To Jury Determine Whether Employee's Refusal To Work With A Specific Supervisor Constituted A &quot;Constructive Resignation&quot;.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Mergers &amp; Acquisitions for High Technology Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/MA.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/MA.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-05-26T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-05-26T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Fenwick &amp; West LLP provides comprehensive legal services to technology and biotechnology clients of national and international prominence.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>India Update: Stock Options for Employees of India Subsidiaries of U.S. Companies</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/India_Update_5-20-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/India_Update_5-20-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>In early May the Reserve Bank of India (&quot;RBI&quot;) eliminated the requirement of granting options at a &quot;concessional&quot; price to employees in India subsidiaries of U.S. companies.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - May 20, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_05-20-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_05-20-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-05-20T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>U.S. Department of Labor Issues New Rules Regarding White-Collar Overtime Exemptions.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - April 30, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-30-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-30-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Corporate Restructuring Not A Reasonable Accommodation Under FEHA/Unequal Pay For Employees With Similar Titles Is Permissible Where Duties And Skill Levels Differ
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Executive_Compensation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Executive_Compensation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-28T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-28T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>FASB Publishes Exposure Draft on Changes to Accounting Rules for Equity Compensation
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - April 23, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-23-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-23-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Merely Hiring From competitor Not Unlawful Interference with Contract/Employee May Claim Retaliation Even if Underlying Complaint Lacks Merit
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Underutilized Patent Reexaminations Can Improve Business Strategy</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Reexaminations.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/IP_Articles/Patent_Reexaminations.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-22T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Patents deployed for strategic business purposes in a licensing or litigation context must be carefully studied to determine the strength of their claims.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Altering Patent Suit Proof Burden Would Chill Innovation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/477/Altering_Patent.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/477/Altering_Patent.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-16T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>American ingenuity is encouraged by a patent system that provides incentives for inventors to disclose their inventions in exchange for a period of exclusivity.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - April 14, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-14-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-14-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-14T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-14T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employee's Contract Claim Withstands Motion to Dismiss Because of Frail &quot;At Will&quot; Provision/Employer Liability for Non-Employee Sexual Harassment May Be Based on Conduct That Occurred to Enactment of FEHA Amendment
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Executive Compensation and Benefits</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Executive_Compensation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/Executive_Compensation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-08T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-08T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>FASB Publishes Exposure Draft on Changes to Accounting Rules for Equity Compensation.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - April 7, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-07-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_04-07-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-04-07T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Employer Properly Disciplined &quot;Whistleblower&quot; for Poor Performance/After Eight Years Of Paid Disability Leave, Employee Sues For Disability Discrimination (And Wins, In Part)
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - March 30, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-30-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-30-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-30T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-30T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Jury Must Decide Whether Employer Lawfully Refused To Re-Hire Recovering Addict/Saleswoman Facing &quot;Glass Ceiling&quot; Allowed To Pursue Constructive Discharge Claim
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>SEC Adopts Final Rules Requiring Additional Form 8-K Disclosures and Accelerating the Filing Deadline</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_03-23-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Corporate/sec/Corp_Sec_03-23-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>On March 11, 2004, the SEC approved new rules that significantly expand the number of events that public companies must report on Form 8-K and that shorten the filing deadline for most events to four business days after the event.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - March 23, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-23-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-23-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-23T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Plaintiff's Post-Termination Misconduct May Bar Reinstatement And Front Pay Award/Court Articulates Limits On Customer Non-Solicitation Clauses
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Weekly Employment Brief - March 18, 2004</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-18-04.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/Employment/WEB_03-18-04.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-18T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Laid Off Employees Need Not Show Replacement By Younger Worker To Show Age Discrimination/Bad-Faith Harassment Complaints Cannot Support Title VII Retaliation Claims
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2004 Update: International Legal Protection for Software</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Software_Protection_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Software_Protection_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This report summarizes the legal protection available for computer software in most significant markets around the world as of January 2004.</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>2004 Update: International Legal Protection for Software - CHART</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Software_Chart_2004.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Software_Chart_2004.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>This chart can be used to determine if subject matter protection is currently available in a particular country for either a U.S. or foreign party's software.
</summary>
    </entry>

    <entry>
        <title>Copyright Infringement Litigation with Some Asides on Software Copyright Litigation</title>
        <link href="http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Infringement_Litigation.pdf"/>
        <id>http://www.fenwick.com/docstore/Publications/IP/Copyright_Infringement_Litigation.pdf</id>
        <author><name/></author>
        <published>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</published>
        <updated>2004-03-11T00:00:00-07:00</updated>
        <summary>Where, What, When, Who and Why
</summary>
    </entry>

</feed>
