|
Trends in Terms of Venture Financings
In the San Francisco Bay Area
(Second Quarter 2006)
·
Background We analyzed the terms
of venture financings for 90 technology companies headquartered in the San
Francisco Bay Area that reported raising money in the second quarter of 2006.
·
Overview The results of the 2Q06 survey showed
a continuation of the strong positive trend in Silicon
Valley venture valuations, although the amount of increase in
valuations was less than some recent quarters.
The highlights of the quarter were as follows:
·
Up rounds exceeded down rounds in 2Q06 for the
tenth quarter in a row (69% up vs. 25% down, with 6% flat), although by less
than 1Q06 (which was 74% up vs. 15% down, with 11% flat).
·
The Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer
showed a 34% average price increase for Silicon Valley
companies receiving venture capital in 2Q06 compared to such companies
previous financing round. Although this
was a significant increase, it was less of an increase than in the prior four
quarters.
Other U.S.
venture industry related results for the quarter included the following:
·
The amount invested by venture capitalists in
the U.S.
in 2Q06 was approximately $6.7 billion, an increase over $6.4 billion in 2Q05
and $6.2 billion in 1Q06. The combined
total of $12.9 billion for the first half of 2006 puts the industry on pace for
its largest investing year since 2001. 1
·
Acquisitions of venture backed companies in the U.S.
in 2Q06 was approximately $7.1 billion in 92 transactions. This was a decline from $8.5 billion/97
transactions and $8.4 billion/103 transactions in 2Q05 and 1Q06, respectively,
although the combined total of $15.5 billion/195 transactions for the first
half of 2006 puts the industry on pace for its best acquisitions year since 2000.
1
·
There were 16 IPOs of venture backed companies
in the U.S.
in 2Q06, of which 10 were health care companies. These IPOs raised $1.3 billion. This was an improvement over 13 IPOs raising
$.6 billion in 1Q06 and the combined total of 29 IPOs raising $1.9 billion in
the first half of 2006 puts the industry on pace to have its best IPO year
since 2000, other than 2004 when 67 IPOs raised $5 billion. 1
·
Nasdaq was down 7% in 2Q06 and is down less than
1% in 3Q06 to date.
·
Financing Round The financings broke down according to the following rounds:
|
Series
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
A
|
14%
|
11%
|
22%
|
18%
|
15%
|
24%
|
18%
|
14%
|
|
B
|
34%
|
40%
|
35%
|
31%
|
26%
|
29%
|
24%
|
29%
|
|
C
|
28%
|
17%
|
17%
|
23%
|
27%
|
16%
|
28%
|
20%
|
|
D
|
16%
|
15%
|
11%
|
15%
|
21%
|
22%
|
18%
|
20%
|
|
E and higher
|
8%
|
17%
|
15%
|
13%
|
11%
|
9%
|
12%
|
17%
|
·
Price Change The direction of price changes for companies receiving financing
this quarter, compared to their previous round, were as follows:
|
Price Change
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
Down
|
25%
|
15%
|
19%
|
25%
|
31%
|
31%
|
28%
|
32%
|
|
Flat
|
6%
|
11%
|
12%
|
15%
|
4%
|
10%
|
12%
|
15%
|
|
Up
|
69%
|
74%
|
69%
|
60%
|
65%
|
59%
|
60%
|
53%
|
The percentage
of down rounds by series were as follows:
|
Series
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
B
|
16%
|
12%
|
10%
|
16%
|
12%
|
19%
|
24%
|
12%
|
|
C
|
32%
|
12%
|
5%
|
35%
|
32%
|
36%
|
25%
|
32%
|
|
D
|
14%
|
27%
|
46%
|
33%
|
37%
|
30%
|
28%
|
52%
|
|
E and higher
|
57%
|
12%
|
35%
|
23%
|
60%
|
62%
|
42%
|
42%
|
The
Fenwick & West Venture Capital Barometer (Magnitude of Price Change) Set forth below is (i) for
up rounds, the average per share percentage increase over the previous round,
(ii) for down rounds, the average per share percentage decrease over the
previous round, and (iii) the overall average per share percentage change from
the previous round for all rounds taken together. Such information is broken down by series for
Q206 and is provided on an aggregate basis for comparison purposes for the
prior five quarters. In calculating the
net result for all rounds, flat rounds are included. For purposes of these calculations, all
financings are considered equal, and accordingly we have not weighted the
results for the amount raised in a financing.
Q206
|
Percent Change
|
Series B
|
Series C
|
Series D
|
Series E and higher
|
Combined total for all Series for Q206
|
Combined total for all Series for Q106
|
Combined total for all Series for Q405
|
Combined total for all Series for Q305
|
Combined total for all Series for Q205
|
Combined total for all Series for Q105
|
|
Up rounds
|
+89%
|
+59%
|
+30%
|
+100%
|
+69%
|
+95%
|
+81%
|
+88%
|
+83%
|
+66%
|
|
Down rounds
|
-55%
|
-50%
|
-86%
|
-58%
|
-57%
|
-49%
|
-56%
|
-60%
|
-43%
|
-49%
|
|
Net result
|
+66%
|
+17%
|
+12%
|
-5%
|
+34%
|
+64%
|
+45%
|
+38%
|
+41%
|
+24%
|
·
Liquidation Preference Senior liquidation preferences were used in the
following percentages of financings:
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
50%
|
40%
|
41%
|
57%
|
46%
|
50%
|
46%
|
54%
|
The percentage of senior liquidation preference by series was as
follows:
|
Series
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
B
|
35%
|
29%
|
22%
|
42%
|
25%
|
38%
|
32%
|
33%
|
|
C
|
76%
|
47%
|
40%
|
48%
|
40%
|
57%
|
39%
|
59%
|
|
D
|
36%
|
60%
|
69%
|
87%
|
68%
|
55%
|
72%
|
61%
|
|
E and higher
|
57%
|
41%
|
65%
|
77%
|
70%
|
62%
|
50%
|
74%
|
·
Multiple Liquidation Preferences - The percentage of senior liquidation
preferences that were multiple preferences were as follows:
|
Q206
|
Q106
|
Q405
|
Q305
|
Q205
|
Q105
|
Q4 04
|
Q3 04
|
|
16%
|
14%
|
24%
|
30%
|
22%
|
12%
|
24%
|
31%
|
Of the senior
liquidation preferences, the ranges of the multiples broke down as follows:
|