For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

FLEX by Fenwick is the only service created by an AmLaw 100 firm that provides flexible and cost-effective solutions for interim in-house legal needs to high-growth companies.  MORE >

Fenwick & West handles significant cross-border legal and business issues for a wide range of technology and life sciences who operate internationally..  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney


We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200

5 Items California Employers Should Review On Arbitration Deals

February 07, 2014

​Dan McCoy, co-chair of Fenwick & West’s employment practices group, talked with Law360 about multiple issues California employers should look out for in arbitration agreements while awaiting the final court decision on enforceability of class action waivers in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC.

One issue to consider is whether the cost of arbitration still makes it worth pursuing compared to the court system, as the arbitration process has grown more expensive over the last decade.

“There is much more discovery that occurs in arbitration and claims are dragged out,” said McCoy. “Arbitration can cost a significant amount even in a single-plaintiff case alleging wrongful termination or discrimination. Employers can easily spend six figures just on their own attorneys’ fees, and often it can be much, much more.”

Another issue to think about is whether a class waiver is even needed. While a large corporation might want a waiver to limit the chance of facing a major class action, a small startup should probably be less concerned, McCoy said.

“When I’m talking to a startup with 35 employees, I tell it that a class action waiver may be risky in terms of enforcement and may not give it all that much value,” McCoy said. “On the other hand, a company with thousands of employees is likely to be more desirous of having a waiver and may want to take the risk of installing one.”

But if a company is drafting an arbitration agreement from scratch, it may be better to leave a class waiver out, McCoy said. “The conservative, prudent course is that it’s better to wait and see before installing a class action waiver that is deemed unenforceable.”

Yet another issue in drafting an arbitration agreement is whether it complies with the California Supreme Court decision in Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, which found that mandatory employment arbitration deals must be bilateral.

“If an employer is going to have a mandatory arbitration agreement with employees, it has to be mutual so that both sides are subject to arbitration and so that other conditions are fair,” McCoy said.

Finally, an employer should review its arbitration agreement on at least an annual basis to keep it updated, McCoy told Law360.

“Not a day goes by where I don’t review a form an employer is using that is out of date. It was put in place 10 or 12 years ago when the terms and conditions were enforceable, but with the passage of time, the agreement has become unenforceable in some respects.”

Employers should avoid relying on stock agreements for the same reason, he added. “Don’t pull an arbitration agreement form off the Internet and assume it’s accurate and up to date,” McCoy said. “This is a fluid area of the law and the Iskanian case is a good example of that.”

The full article is available through the Law360 website (subscription required).