Executive Compensation Alert: Action Required for 2010 162(m) Performance Pay


Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the "Code") denies a tax deduction to a public company if compensation paid to certain individuals (known as "covered employees") exceeds one million dollars for the taxable year. However, compensation that is "performance-based" within the meaning of Code Section 162(m) is deductible by the public company for tax purposes. A "covered employee" is defined as a public company's Chief Executive Officer and its three other most highly compensated officers (excluding the CFO) whose compensation is required by the SEC to be disclosed for a given year.

New Ruling

On February 21, 2008 the IRS released Revenue Ruling 2008-13 (discussed previously in our earlier alert at []. Revenue Ruling 2008-13 ruled that compensation paid by a public company that is intended to constitute "performance-based" compensation (such as a covered employee's bonus) under Code Section 162(m) does not include compensation payable in the event of a covered employee's: (1) retirement, (2) termination without cause, or (3) termination for good reason, without taking into account whether the relevant performance metrics had been satisfied.

Transition Period

While Revenue Ruling 2008-13 reversed the IRS's prior position on these issues, the Ruling nonetheless provides public companies with a transition period. Namely, Ruling 2008-13 does not apply (1) where the performance period in question began on or before January 1, 2009 or (2) the amount intended to qualify as performance-based compensation is paid under an employment contract that was in effect on February 21, 2008.

What Public Companies Should Do

The performance period for calendar year public companies is coming to a close and public companies that maintain bonus arrangements that are intended to be "performance-based" compensation for Code Section 162(m) purposes need to review such programs to ensure that these bonuses are not paid upon a termination without cause, for good reason or because of retirement, without regard to whether the applicable performance metrics were satisfied. Also, public companies should review current employment agreements in existence on February 21, 2008 that contain automatic renewals or contain an expiration date. There are potential solutions that can be put in place that will result in deductibility, but companies must act before 2010 bonus metrics are formulated and communicated by compensation committees.

For more information, you may contact any attorney in the Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group.

Scott P. Spector (650.335.7251–
Blake W. Martell (650.335.7606–
John E. Ludlum (650.335.7872–
Liza Wells Morgan (650.335.7230–
Gerald Audant (415.875.2362–
Nicholas F. Frey (650.335.7882–

©2009 Fenwick & West LLP. All Rights Reserved.

The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Fenwick & West LLP or its clients. The content of the publication ("content") is not offered as legal or any other advice on any particular matter. The publication of any content is not intended to create and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship between you and Fenwick & West LLP. You should not act or refrain from acting on the basis of any content included in the publication without seeking the appropriate legal or professional advice on the particular facts and circumstances at issue.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: to ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written by Fenwick & West LLP to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the internal revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.​