close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Executive Compensation Alert: India Proposes that Employers Pay a 35% Tax on Stock-Related Compensation

Proposed Law

The Government of India’s proposed budget for 2007-2008 (commencing April 1, 2007) includes extending the 35% fringe benefit tax imposed on employers to the income their employees in India recognize on exercise of compensatory stock options. The income would be the difference between the price paid for the shares and the fair market value of the shares on the date of exercise. Although still subject to some negotiation, it appears more likely than not that this law will take effect as proposed on April 1, 2007. Thus, for stock options that have already been granted to persons in India it appears to be desirable for the employer to encourage these persons to exercise these options, at least with respect to vested shares, prior to April 1, 2007, and thereby avoid this tax treatment. It appears that going forward, the terms of a stock option agreement could include a provision requiring that on exercise the employee reimburse the employer for the amount of this tax paid by the employer. This would be similar to the practice that has developed with respect to stock options granted to employees in the United Kingdom. The UK government also imposes a sizable tax on the employer when the employee exercises an in-the-money stock option, but the UK tax authority has established a process by which the employer can require the employee to reimburse the employer for this tax. With respect to India however, labor laws need to be reviewed to determine if tax shifting is permitted.

Anticipated Effect

Several effects can be reasonably anticipated if this proposal is enacted. First, stock options will be more selectively granted to employees and will be a less attractive way to incentivize employees. Another consequence is that prospective employees in India will negotiate instead for higher forms of other compensation, particularly cash. To the extent that much current investment in India has been in the technology and knowledge sectors by newly-formed, cash-tight enterprises it can be expected that this will discourage such activity. Current employers in India that granted stock options to employees in India and therefore find themselves, faced with an uncapped tax liability for which they had not planned or negotiated (the UK, at least, applied their tax to option grants that occurred after it took effect), will be further encouraged to reduce their investment in India in favor of other locations. It is not clear how this will affect foreign parent companies that have granted options to employees of their India subsidiary.

For further information, please contact:

Fred M. Greguras, Of Counsel, Corporate Group
fgreguras@fenwick.com, 650.335.7241

Tahir J. Naim, Associate, Corporate Group
tnaim@fenwick.com, 650.335.7326

S.R. Gopalan of Dawn Consulting
srg@dawnconsulting.com


This update is intended by Fenwick & West LLP to summarize recent developments in the law. It is not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Readers who have particular questions about these issues should seek advice of counsel.

© 2007 Fenwick & West LLP. All Rights Reserved.