close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Executive Compensation Alert: Payments Do Not Qualify as Performance-Based Compensation Under 162(m) Where Payments are Permitted Under a Severance Arrangement

The Internal Revenue Service published a private letter ruling on January 28, 2008 (PLR 200804004) holding that amounts paid to a recipient under an incentive compensation plan intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (the "Code") will not qualify as performance-based compensation where the recipient's employment agreement provides for payment of the performance compensation upon a termination of employment without cause or for good reason, whether or not the performance metrics are satisfied.

Code Section 162(m) limits a public company's tax deduction for compensation paid to covered employees to $1 million per covered employee per year. This limitation does not apply to "performance-based" compensation programs. A "covered employee" includes a company's principal executive officer (i.e., its CEO) and its other three highest compensated officers (other than the principal executive officer or the principal financial officer).

In this PLR, the company had entered into an employment agreement with an executive who had received performance shares and units under its performance-based incentive compensation plan. The executive's employment agreement provided that in the event he was terminated without cause or for good reason (as such terms were defined in the agreement), then any performance goals would be deemed to have been satisfied and such performance shares or units would vest at the time of termination to the extent the shares or units would have vested in accordance with the normal vesting schedule had the executive remained employed for two years.

The IRS held that the provision in the employment agreement allowing for payment of performance shares or units upon the executive's termination of employment without cause or for good reason did not meet the exception in the regulations under Section 162(m) that permits compensation to be paid upon death, disability or change in the ownership or control of the company. Accordingly, the IRS held that compensation paid to the executive would not be considered performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code even where the executives do not terminate employment but instead satisfy the performance metrics.

PLR 200804004 differs from the IRS holding in two earlier private letter rulings which found that amounts paid under an incentive compensation plan upon satisfaction of the relevant performance metrics qualified as incentive compensation notwithstanding the fact that the plan would provide payment upon retirement or upon an involuntary termination without the relevant performance metrics having been met. Under these earlier rulings only the bonuses paid upon retirement or upon an involuntary termination would fail to qualify as performance based compensation.

What Should You Do?

It is unclear whether PLR 200804004 revokes the prior IRS rulings. However, at a minimum, and pending further advice from the IRS, which may take the form of a published ruling in the near future, companies should consider amending employment agreements, or their incentive arrangements (including performance-based stock and RSU grants) to delete provisions that permit payment (or vesting) upon an involuntary termination of employment apart from a change of control. In this regard, it is the performance stock grants that provide the biggest potential tax concerns as it is the value of the awards at the vesting (or in the case of options, exercise) dates where the potential loss of deduction occurs. Further, we understand that auditors have started to consider the need for FIN 48 reserves to be taken for performance based payments made in 2008 that could be affected by the new IRS position. The good news is that it may be possible to achieve the company's intended result of paying out a portion of any bargained for incentive compensation upon termination in the form of an increased multiple of salary. However, you should discuss this possibility with your legal and accounting advisors if you maintain a 162(m) shareholder approved plan and in any event before implementing alternative arrangements as a result of PLR 200804004.

PLR 200804004 may be viewed at: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-wd/0804004.pdf


For more information on this, or related matters, please contact any attorney in the Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group:

Scott P. Spector (650.335.7251 – sspector@fenwick.com),
Blake W. Martell (650.335.7606 – bmartell@fenwick.com),
John E. Ludlum (650.335.7872 – jludlum@fenwick.com) and
Tahir J. Naim (650.335.7326 - tnaim@fenwick.com), in the Executive Compensation and Employee Benefits Group.


©2008 Fenwick & West LLP. All Rights Reserved.

This alert is intended by Fenwick & West LLP to summarize recent developments in the law. It is not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Readers who have particular questions about these issues should seek advice of counsel.

IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice in this communication (including attachments) is not intended or written by Fenwick & West LLP to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the internal revenue code or (ii) promoting, marketing, or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.​​