close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Executive Compensation and Corporate and Securities Alert: UPDATED NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Rules Relating to Compensation

This summary has been updated to reflect the amendment to the Nasdaq Proposed Rules now referenced in the third paragraph of the Overview below.

Overview

On June 20, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") adopted final rules ("SEC Rules") to implement Dodd-Frank Act Section 952, requiring national securities exchanges to prohibit the initial or continued listing of any stock of a company that does not satisfy compensation committee independence criteria and compensation adviser independence criteria.

Under the SEC Rules (http://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2012/33-9330.pdf), each national securities exchange and national securities association must submit to the SEC, no later than 90 days after publication of the SEC Rules in the Federal Register, proposed rule change submissions (which the SEC must approve) to implement the listing standards.

The NYSE and the Nasdaq recently issued their proposals (the "NYSE Proposed Rules" and the "Nasdaq Proposed Rules," respectively), as filed with the SEC on September 25, 2012. The Nasdaq Proposed Rules are available here: http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQ/pdf/nasdaq-filings/2012/SR-NASDAQ-2012-109.pdf. The Nasdaq has just issued an amendment to the Nasdaq Proposed Rules, as filed with the SEC on December 12, 2012 (see http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQ/pdf/nasdaq-filings/2012/SR-NASDAQ-2012-109_Amendment_1.pdf). A summary of the NYSE Proposed Rules and Nasdaq Proposed Rules (as amended) is set forth below.

Compensation Committee Member Independence

The SEC Rules do not include a uniform definition of "independence." The SEC instructed the exchanges to establish their own independence criteria for members of compensation committees, as well as any other board committee which performs functions typically performed by a compensation committee, including oversight of executive compensation (in either case, "compensation committee"). In establishing their independence definitions, the exchanges are to consider "relevant factors" that must at a minimum include:

  • The source of the board member's compensation, including any consulting, advisory or other fees paid by the issuer; and
  • Whether a board member is affiliated with the issuer or any subsidiary of the issuer.

The SEC left it to the exchanges to determine if any additional factors are to be included in their rules.

NYSE Proposed Rules

The NYSE Proposed Rules do not include any additional factors to be considered by the listed company board when making independence determinations under its independence standards. Likewise, the NYSE does not specifically exclude a board member from serving on the compensation committee because of an affiliate relationship with the listed company or its other affiliates.  Rather, the NYSE Proposed Rules provide discretion to determine how consulting, advisory and other compensatory fees and affiliate status may affect a member's independence. The NYSE Proposed Rules make clear that these factors should be considered as part of its affirmative determination of all factors specifically relevant to determining whether a director has a relationship to the listed company which is material to that director's ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties as a member of a compensation committee.

In making the independence assessments, the board will need to consider whether (a) the director receives compensation from any person or entity, including consulting, advisors and other fees paid by the listed company, or (b) an affiliate relationship places the director under control of the company or management, or creates a relationship, which in either case could impair the director's independent judgment when making independent compensation decisions.

Nasdaq Proposed Rules

The Nasdaq Proposed Rules similarly provide that in addition to considering the affiliate status of a director, the listed company board must also consider whether such affiliation would impair the director's judgment as a member of the compensation committee. The accompanying interpretive guidance further states that the Nasdaq does not believe that ownership of listed company stock by itself, or possession of a controlling interest through ownership of listed company stock by itself, precludes a board finding that it is appropriate for a director to serve on the compensation committee. The Nasdaq Proposed Rules also specifically provide that it may be appropriate for certain affiliates, such as representatives of significant stockholders, to serve on compensation committees since their interests are likely aligned with those of other stockholders in determining executive compensation.

However, unlike the NYSE Proposed Rules, the Nasdaq Proposed Rules would impose a specific prohibition on accepting directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the listed company, rather than making this one factor for boards to consider in assessing independence (this excludes director fees and retirement payments for prior services with the entity).

The Nasdaq Proposed Rules would also no longer allow compensation decisions to be made by a majority of independent directors in lieu of having a compensation committee (which had previously been permitted). The Nasdaq Proposed Rules would require companies to have a compensation committee with at least two members, generally all of whom must be independent directors. A non-independent director could serve on the compensation committee under certain limited circumstances if the compensation committee consists of at least three members, and the non-independent director is not an executive.  The Nasdaq Proposed Rules also include minimum compensation committee charter requirements.

Compensation Consultants and Advisers

The SEC Rules require compensation committees to take into consideration the following independence factors when selecting, or obtaining advice from, compensation advisers:

  • The provision of other services to the issuer by the employer that employs the compensation adviser;
  • The amount of fees received from the issuer by the employer that employs the compensation adviser, as a percentage of the employer's total revenue;
  • The policies and procedures of the employer that employs the compensation adviser that are designed to prevent conflicts of interests;
  • Any business or personal relationship of the compensation adviser with a member of the compensation committee;
  • Any stock of the issuer owned by the compensation adviser; and
  • Any business or personal relationships between the issuer's executive officers and the compensation adviser or the entity that employs the compensation adviser.

The SEC expressed its view that these six factors should be considered in their totality but that no one factor should be viewed as a determinative factor of independence. However, the SEC Rules do not indicate any materiality, numerical or other threshold test. The exchanges may also consider other independence factors in adopting their compensation adviser independence listing criteria. The SEC chose not to adopt specific materiality or numerical or other bright-line thresholds with respect to such adviser independence factors.

NYSE Proposed Rules

The NYSE Proposed Rules would adopt the six independence factors that compensation committees must consider with respect to the adviser's independence from management when selecting a compensation consultant, outside legal counsel (but not inside legal counsel) or other advisers to the compensation committee. The compensation committee is required to conduct this assessment with respect to those advisers that provide advice to the compensation committee.

The NYSE Proposed Rules also require the compensation committee to consider any other factors that would be relevant to the adviser's independence from management, thus instructing the compensation committee to determine if there are additional pertinent factors to be taken into account.

Nasdaq Proposed Rules

The Nasdaq Proposed Rules also make clear, that unlike the NYSE proposed rules, the compensation committee need consider only the six factors with respect to the adviser's independence that are in the SEC Rules prior to selecting or otherwise receiving advice from an adviser (even if not formally "selected" as an adviser to the compensation committee). As amended, the Nasdaq Proposed Rules make explicit that compensation committees are not required to retain or receive advice from independent advisers – rather they are only required to consider the specified factors related to independence before doing so (consistent with the SEC Rules and its guidance in the adopting release).

Effectiveness Timeline

NYSE Proposed Rules

The NYSE Proposed Rules generally take effect on July 1, 2013.  NYSE-listed companies would have until the earlier of October 31, 2014 or their first annual meeting after January 15, 2014 to comply with the independence standards.

Nasdaq Proposed Rules

The Nasdaq Proposed Rules relating to compensation committee responsibilities and relating to the (a) authority to retain compensation consultants, independent legal counsel and other compensation advisers; (b) authority to fund such advisers; and (c) responsibility to consider certain independence factors before selecting such advisers, other than in-house legal counsel, are effective July 1, 2013. The remainder of the Nasdaq Proposed Rules, including the committee member independence standards and specific charter requirements, must be complied with by the earlier of either October 31, 2014 or the first annual meeting held after January 15, 2014. Nasdaq will require a certification as to compliance within 30 days after the final implementation deadline applicable to a listed company. The form of compensation committee certification will be available through Nasdaq's Listing Center website
(http://listingcenter.nasdaqomx.com/) prior to the effective date of the Nasdaq Proposed Rules.​​