close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Litigation Alert: District Court Rules that Shrinkwrap Agreement May Be Enforceable

On April 5, 2006, the District Court for the Eastern District of California ruled in the case of Meridian Project Systems, Inc. v. Hardin Construction Co., L.L.C., Civ.04-2728, that an End User License Agreement ("EULA") contained within software packaging may be an enforceable "shrinkwrap" agreement. The Court further found that a contract action based on the EULA would not be preempted by the Copyright Act.

Facts

Plaintiff Meridian Project Systems provides software solutions to manage construction projects, including the project management software Prolog Manager. Meridian's standard practice was to send Prolog customers a box containing a CD, a user manual, and a copy of the EULA. The EULA sets forth the terms of use, which a purchaser can reject by returning the software. Defendant Hardin Construction had purchased and used Prolog Manager in connection with its business since 1996 and had never returned any copies or objected to the terms of the EULA.

Meridian brought suit, among other things, for breach of contract and copyright infringement when Hardin violated terms of the EULA by copying and sending Prolog help file text to a competing software company. In opposing Meridian's summary judgment motion, Hardin contended, inter alia, that the validity of shrinkwrap licenses has not yet been determined by the Ninth Circuit, and that in any event a contract action based on such copying would be preempted by the Copyright Act.

Decision

The Court acknowledged that, although shrinkwrap licenses are widely used in the software industry, there remains a dispute across Federal Circuits about their validity. Some courts have found such licenses invalid as unconscionable or unacceptable contracts of adhesion, while other courts have held that these types of licenses are valid and enforceable contracts.

The Meridian court found the EULA to be enforceable here notwithstanding the fact that Hardin could not review the license until it had already opened the package. It based its conclusion primarily on the Seventh Circuit's decision in ProCD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996). In ProCD, the Seventh Circuit found shrinkwrap licenses enforceable against end-users, basing its conclusion on policy considerations specific to the software industry, an industry in which many purchases are made over the Internet by consumers who never see a box. The ProCD court noted that the reality of the software industry is such that a license should not be unenforceable simply because the consumer was not able to read it before purchasing the product. The Seventh Circuit provided several examples in other areas where contracts are enforceable in a "pay first, agree later" form, including travel and concert tickets.

Here, the Meridian opinion noted that Hardin was provided with and had notice of the EULA. Hardin could have returned the software if it did not agree with the license terms, but it chose not to do so. Under these facts, the Court concluded that the EULA was neither an unconscionable contract nor an unacceptable contract of adhesion. The Court further found that Meridian's contract action was not preempted by the Copyright Act because it contained an "extra element" – the mutual assent and consideration required by a contract claim.

Impact

While the issue of enforceability of such agreements has not been decided by the Ninth Circuit, this case adds to the growing body of case law in California District Courts suggesting that shrinkwrap agreements are enforceable, even when they are not visible to customers at the time of purchase.


If you have questions about the issues raised in this alert, please contact:

Patrick E. Premo, Partner, Litigation Group
ppremo@fenwick.com, 650-335-7963

Ilana S. Rubel, Associate, Litigation Group
irubel@fenwick.com, 650-335-7208

This update is intended by Fenwick & West LLP to summarize recent developments in the law. It is not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Readers who have particular questions about these issues should seek advice of counsel.