close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Litigation Alert: Inefficient Electronic Discovery Management Can Cost Clients

On December 14, 2005, the Delaware Chancery Court reduced recovery of plaintiffs' attorneys' fees in a securities case by nearly $1.2 million, in large part for inefficiently managing electronic discovery. Specifically, the Court pointed out the "obvious inefficiencies" in plaintiffs' decision to print digitally produced documents onto paper and copy that paper for distribution and review.

The Case

In the shareholder class action In re Instinet Group, Inc. Shareholders Litigation, Consolidated C.A. No. 1289-N, 2005 Del. Ch. LEXIS 195 (Dec. 14, 2005), plaintiffs' counsel applied for over $1.6 million of fees and costs after the court approved a stipulated settlement. Plaintiffs claimed nearly $125,000 of costs for photocopying and related services (most of which was spent converting several hundred-thousand pages of documents from electronic to paper format), and they also claimed attorneys' fees for "a very large amount of time" to review the converted documents.

The Court strongly criticized the decision to convert documents produced in a digital format into a paper format. Vice Chancellor Stephen Lamb wrote,

Rather than simply copying the electronic media to permit the plaintiffs' lawyers working on the case to search and review the document production on a computer screen, the plaintiffs spewed the digital production onto paper and, then, copied the paper for review. This approach both added unnecessary expense and greatly increased the number of hours required to search and review the document production. In fact, the time records submitted include a large number of hours, by multiple attorneys, spent reviewing the documents. Thus, the court must disagree with the plaintiffs' counsel's assertion that "this case was a paradigm of efficient litigation," [footnote omitted] and give less weight than customary to the number of hours expended by plaintiffs' counsel. Additionally, it would be inappropriate to award the full amount of out-of-pocket expenses, as the very costly decision to "blow back" the digitized document discovery onto paper lacks justification.

Taking into account these electronic discovery inefficiencies and other considerations, the Court awarded plaintiffs only $450,000 of fees and costs, nearly $1.2 million less than plaintiffs had claimed.

Practical Implications

In awarding attorneys' fees and costs, courts are more closely scrutinizing the efficiencies of parties' discovery choices and are becoming much savvier about electronic discovery. Regardless of whether fees and costs are recoverable in a particular case, it pays to manage electronic discovery efficiently.

Fenwick & West's Practice Support (FWPS) team works closely with the firm's attorneys to assure that electronic information is collected, winnowed and reviewed in the most cost-effective and high-tech fashion. Our "eDiscovery aware" de-duplication and filtering methods often reduce the volume of data the lawyers review by 20%-80%.


Learn more about Fenwick & West's eDiscovery services.

For further information, please contact:

Michael A. Sands, Litigation Partner
msands@fenwick.com, 650-335-7279

Robert D. Brownstone, Esq., Practice Technology Manager
rbrownstone@fenwick.com, 650-335-7912

Karen P. Anderson, Senior Litigation Associate
kanderson@fenwick.com, 650-335-7105

Anthony P. Dykes, Litigation Associate
adykes@fenwick.com, 650-335-7245

This update is intended by Fenwick & West LLP to summarize recent developments in the law. It is not intended, and should not be regarded, as legal advice. Readers who have particular questions about these issues should seek advice of counsel.