close

Search Re​sults​​

Sort by Recent Relevant​

Test-Publication-October-2016

Publication

10/19/2010 - Meta description here

Mobile-Phone Case at U.S. Supreme Court to Test Privacy Protections

News

11/22/2017 - Fenwick privacy lawyer Hanley Chew discusses Carpenter v. United States and how the case may limit law enforcement officials’ power to track persons using mobile phone data.

Making Sense of the Revived 'Machine-or-Transformation' Test in In re Bilski

Publication

3/16/2009 - On October 30, 2008, in In re Bilski, No. 07-1130 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 30, 2008) the Federal Circuit handed down the latest judicial effort to provide guidance about the types of subject matter that are eligible for patent protection.

Dow Chemical Loses U.S. Court Test of R&D Tax Credits

News

9/7/2012 - Fenwick partner Michael Solomon was quoted in a Reuters article titled “Dow Chemical loses U.S. court test of R&D tax credits.”

Viewpoint: Supreme Court Should Set Objective Test for Software Patents

Publication

2/21/2014 - Is software patentable? Computers and software are everywhere in our daily lives; we rely on software inventions in our homes, our workplaces, our automobiles and our schools.

Litigation Alert: Supreme Court Expands Discretion to Award Enhanced Damages for Patent Infringement and Eliminates the Federal Circuit's “Seagate Test”

Publication

6/15/2016 - Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc., the United States Supreme Court changed the law regarding when enhanced damages should be awarded in patent infringement cases, by eliminating the two-part test.

Patent Alert: Federal Circuit en banc Clarifies the Test for Determining When Processes are Patentable

Publication

10/31/2008 - In a long-awaited decision, on October 30, 2008, the Federal Circuit en banc decided In re Bilski, clarifying the test for determining whether a process patent claim qualifies as patentable subject matter under Section 101 of the U.S. Patent Act.

Litigation Alert: eBay v. MercExchange: Supreme Court Clarifies Test for Permanent Injunction in Patent Cases

Publication

5/15/2006 - A decision today by the United States Supreme Court is likely to impact the dynamic in many patent litigation lawsuits brought by companies that purchase patents in order to sue other companies for infringing them.

Fenwick & West Client CardioDx's Blood Test Named As One of TIME Magazine's Top Ten Medical Breakthroughs of 2010

Press Release

12/27/2010 - TIME Magazine named CardioDx's blood-based gene expression test, Corus CAD, one of the Top Ten medical breakthroughs of 2010. The Corus CAD test also won a Technology Innovation Award from The Wall Street Journal this year.

Intellectual Property Alert: Supreme Court Rules Against Broadly Claimed Software Patents, But Offers No Clear Test for Abstract Ideas

Publication

6/20/2014 - Supreme Court Rules Against Broadly Claimed Software Patents, But Offers No Clear Test for Abstract Ideas.

1-10 of about 210 results

John T. McNelis

Partner

T: 650.335.7133 | Email

Robert Hulse

Partner

T: 415.875.2444 | Email

Sheeva J. Ghassemi-Vanni

Associate

T: 650.335.7191 | Email

Ninth Circuit Makes it Easier to Sue for Video Privacy Protection Act Violations But Harder to Win

Publication

12/5/2017 - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held in Eichenberger v. ESPN that allegations that the Video Privacy Protection Act was violated are sufficient to establish Article III standing, but that the definition of “personally identifiable informat

New Guidance from SEC Encourages Board Involvement in Excluding Certain Shareholder Proposals

Publication

11/29/2017 - The staff of the Division of Corporation Finance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2017, issued a new Staff Legal Bulletin regarding shareholder proposals under Rule 14a-8.

Good News for Game Developers: Court Extends Protections for Using Others’ Trademarks in the Advertising of Artistic Works

Publication

11/29/2017 - In a move that will likely benefit game developers, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit explicitly held that First Amendment protection extends to use of third-party trademarks in the commercial promotion of an artistic work.

Vikram Iyengar, Ph.D.

Associate

T: 650.335.7140 | Email

Mobile-Phone Case at U.S. Supreme Court to Test Privacy Protections

News

11/22/2017 - Fenwick privacy lawyer Hanley Chew discusses Carpenter v. United States and how the case may limit law enforcement officials’ power to track persons using mobile phone data.

Court Says Glassdoor Must Disclose Anonymous Reviewers’ Information in Grand Jury Proceedings

Publication

11/16/2017 - In a case with free speech implications, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on November 8, 2017, affirmed the denial of Glassdoor, Inc.’s motion to quash a grand jury subpoena for the identities of the Glassdoor users who anonymously posted a

Intellectual Property Bulletin - Fall 2017

Publication

11/6/2017 - Fenwick & West Intellectual Property Bulletin. Covering current legal issues in patent, copyright and intellectual property law.