Unique Privacy Concerns for Mobile Apps
Tips for Mobile App Privacy Compliance
Safeguards against Data Security Breaches (Part Two)
For more than four decades, Fenwick & West has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.
Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.
From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.
At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.
Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:
We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.
Read more about our commitment to sustainability and cleantech
At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.
Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500
San Francisco Office
555 California Street
12th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300
Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510
Last year we published our first Seed Financing Survey in recognition of the growing importance of seed financing to entrepreneurs and the venture capital environment, especially in the internet/digital media and software industries.
This is our second such survey. In addition to providing information for 2011, this survey also offers comparative information with 2010 to facilitate the identification of trends.
The information contained in this survey is based on 56 transactions in 2011 and 52 in 2010. The vast majority of these transactions were for companies based in Silicon Valley, with some from the Seattle and Los Angeles regions.Overview of Seed Financing Environment
The seed financing environment for internet/digital media and software companies is expanding and becoming increasingly varied. Although there are no definitive figures of which we are aware on the size of the market, anecdotal evidence and third party data indicates that the market is growing significantly. Third party information includes the following:
Not only is the amount of seed investing increasing, but the diversity of seed funding sources is also increasing. Seed investments are available from:
With this proliferation of seed capital and diversity of sources, the "leverage" in seed transactions seems to be leaning in favor of entrepreneurs, as preferred stock valuations, convertible note usage and convertible note cap amounts are increasing, as described in our survey results below. This trend is consistent with the results of our separate venture capital survey (www.fenwick.com/vcsurvey), which shows that internet/digital media and software companies receiving later stage funding are also obtaining increased valuations.
Other anecdotal trends noted in the seed environment are faster investment decision-making by investors and in some cases guaranteed funding of accelerator/incubator participants, which also evidence a good environment for entrepreneurs.
While it is certainly possible that we are seeing some "irrational exuberance" in the market, we believe that there are solid, fundamental reasons for the growth of seed capital investing.
First, the internet, and related new tools and technologies, have fundamentally reduced the time and expense it takes to bring internet/digital media and software products to market, allowing investors to get more "bang" and information for their buck.
Second, the growth of mobile devices and internet usage in general has increased the demand for the products and technologies being developed by these early stage companies. And there is certainly a significant potential payoff for them – with over 30 venture-backed technology companies currently having valuations over $1 billion.
And third, the hurdle for seed funded companies to obtain their next round of financing appears to be significant (note that in our survey less than half of companies receiving seed funding in 2010 had received venture funding within 18 months). This suggests that the increasing number of companies receiving seed funding are being carefully evaluated before they are being provided with more substantial next stage funding.
Update on Companies Included in our 2010 Seed Financing Survey
On average 18 months has passed since the companies included in our 2010 survey raised their seed round of financing. Set forth below is information on what has happened to those companies during that time period.
|
Overview of 2011 Seed Financing Survey Results
We saw the following notable trends in the 2011 survey:
In general we consider the increased use of convertible notes, the increased cap on convertible notes and the increased valuation of preferred stock transactions to be entrepreneur friendly trends, and the increased use of convertible note discounts and increased note holder rights on an acquisition to be investor friendly trends, but generally less important than the entrepreneur friendly trends.
Detailed Results of 2011 Seed Financing Survey
| Industry breakdown: | 2010 | 2011 |
| Internet/Digital Media: | 71% |
75% |
| Software: | 29% |
25% |
| Lead investor background: | 2010 | 2011 |
| Seed funds: | 43% |
46% |
| Professional angels: | 31% |
28% |
| Venture capital funds: | 26% |
27% |
| Financing Structure: | 2010 | 2011 |
| Preferred Stock: | 69% |
59% |
| Convertible Debt: | 31% |
41% |
Average Size of Investment
Below is the average size of investment for investors who invested at least $100,000, broken down by type of investor and between Preferred Stock financing and Convertible Note financing.
| Preferred Stock | 2010 |
2011 |
| Professional angels: | $310,000 |
$163,000 |
| Seed funds: | $392,000 |
$423,000 |
| Venture capital funds: | $591,000 |
$516,000 |
| Convertible Notes | 2010 |
2011 |
| Professional angels: | $182,000 |
$244,000 |
| Seed funds: | $140,000 |
$424,000 |
| Venture capital funds: | $290,000 |
$501,000 |
| Analysis of Preferred Stock Seed Financings. | 2010 | 2011 | |
| • | Median pre-amount valuation. | ||
| Internet/Digital media: | $3,400,000 |
$4,000,000 | |
| Software: | $2,700,000 |
$3,500,000 | |
| • | Median amount raised: | $1,056,000 |
$1,000,000 |
| • | Percentage using non-participating preferred liquidation preference: | 90% |
91% |
| • | Percentage using participating preferred liquidation preference: | 10% |
9% |
| • | Percentage in which investors received a board seat: | 72.5% |
70% |
| Analysis of Convertible Note Seed Financing | 2010 | 2011 | |
| • | Median amount raised: | $662,500 |
$1,000,000 |
| • | Median size of future financing in which note converts: | $1,000,000 |
$2,000,000 |
| • | Percentage of deals in which valuation on conversion is capped: | 83% |
82% |
| • | Median valuation cap: | $4,000,000 |
$7,500,000 |
| • | Percentage of deals that convert at a discount to the next equity round valuation: | 67% |
83% |
| • | Median initial discount: | 20% |
20% |
| • | Percentage of deals with discount in which discount increases over time: | 25% |
5% |
| • | Percentage of deals without discount that have a valuation cap: | 100% |
75% |
| • | Percentage of deals having warrants: | 0% |
0% |
| • | Treatment of note if company is acquired prior to an equity financing: |
||
| Receive return of investment plus a premium: | 50% |
61% | |
| Median premium: | 0.75x original principal amount |
1.0x original principal amount | |
| Right to convert at an agreed upon valuation: | 33% |
65% | |
| Percentage that have neither conversion right nor premium: | 17% |
9% | |
| Percentage that have both conversion right and premium: | 0% |
35% | |
| • | Median interest rate: | 6.0% |
5.5% |
| • | Median term: | 18 months |
18 months |
| • | Percentage in which notes are secured: | 0% |
4% |
| • | Percentage in which investors received a board seat: |
8.3% |
4% |
Methodology and Definitions
For purposes of this survey we define a "seed" financing as the first round of financing by a company in which the company raises between $250,000 and $2,500,000, and in which professional investors play a lead role. Please note that this definition excludes financings led by "friends and family", which terms may not be negotiated on an arms-length basis, and smaller financings where parties may not substantially negotiate terms. Due to the foregoing definition of a seed financing, and the fact that all companies surveyed had a connection with our firm, the survey may not be representative of all companies receiving early stage financing, as we are likely over-weighted to more promising companies funded by more established seed investors.
Please note the use of the following additional definitions:
Acknowledgment
We would like to express our appreciation to Josh Kopelman of First Round Capital and Jonathan Levy of Y Combinator for sharing their time with us to brainstorm on some of the trends being observed. That said, the conclusions and data contained herein are ours alone, and should be not attributed to them.
Disclaimer
The preparation of the information contained herein involves assumptions, compilations and analysis, and there can be no assurance that the information provided herein is error-free. Neither Fenwick & West LLP nor any of its partners, associates, staff or agents shall have any liability for any information contained herein, including any errors or incompleteness. The contents of this report are not intended, and should not be considered, as legal advice or opinion.
Contact
For additional information about this report please contact Barry Kramer at 650-335-7278 | bkramer@fenwick.com or Steven Levine at 650-335-7847 | slevine@fenwick.com at Fenwick & West.
To be placed on an email list for future editions of this survey please go to our Seed Survey sign up page.
|