close

For more than four decades, Fenwick & West LLP has helped some of the world’s most recognized companies become, and remain, market leaders. From emerging enterprises to large public corporations, our clients are leaders in the technology, life sciences and cleantech sectors and are fundamentally changing the world through rapid innovation.  MORE >

Fenwick & West was founded in 1972 in the heart of Silicon Valley—before “Silicon Valley” existed—by four visionary lawyers who left a top-tier New York law firm to pursue their shared belief that technology would revolutionize the business world and to pioneer the legal work for those technological innovations. In order to be most effective, they decided they needed to move to a location close to primary research and technology development. These four attorneys opened their first office in downtown Palo Alto, and Fenwick became one of the first technology law firms in the world.  MORE >

From our founding in 1972, Fenwick has been committed to promoting diversity and inclusion both within our firm and throughout the legal profession. For almost four decades, the firm has actively promoted an open and inclusive work environment and committed significant resources towards improving our diversity efforts at every level.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we are proud of our commitment to the community and to our culture of making a difference in the lives of individuals and organizations in the communities where we live and work. We recognize that providing legal services is not only an essential part of our professional responsibility, but also an excellent opportunity for our attorneys to gain valuable practical experience, learn new areas of the law and contribute to the community.  MORE >

Year after year, Fenwick & West is honored for excellence in the legal profession. Many of our attorneys are recognized as leaders in their respective fields, and our Corporate, Tax, Litigation and Intellectual Property Practice Groups consistently receive top national and international rankings, including:

  • Named Technology Group of the Year by Law360
  • Ranked #1 in the Americas for number of technology deals in 2015 by Mergermarket
  • Nearly 20 percent of Fenwick partners are ranked by Chambers
  • Consistently ranked among the top 10 law firms in the U.S. for diversity
  • Recognized as having top mentoring and pro bono programs by Euromoney

MORE >

We take sustainability very seriously at Fenwick. Like many of our clients, we are adopting policies that reduce consumption and waste, and improve efficiency. By using technologies developed by a number of our cleantech clients, we are at the forefront of implementing sustainable policies and practices that minimize environmental impact. In fact, Fenwick has earned recognition in several areas as one of the top US law firms for implementing sustainable business practices.  MORE >

At Fenwick, we have a passion for excellence and innovation that mirrors our client base. Our firm is making revolutionary changes to the practice of law through substantial investments in proprietary technology tools and processes—allowing us to deliver best-in-class legal services more effectively.   MORE >

Mountain View Office
Silicon Valley Center
801 California Street
Mountain View, CA 94041
650.988.8500

San Francisco Office
555 California Street
13th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
415.875.2300

Seattle Office
1191 Second Avenue
10th Floor
Seattle, WA 98101
206.389.4510

New York Office
1211 Avenue of the Americas
32nd Floor
New York, NY 10036
212.921.2001

Shanghai Office
Unit 908, 9/F, Kerry Parkside Office
No. 1155 Fang Dian Road
Pudong New Area, Shanghai 201204
P.R. China
+86 21 8017 1200


Executive Compensation Alert: New Guidance Regarding 83b Elections

On June 26, 2012, the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") released Revenue Procedure 2012-29, which provides language that taxpayers may use when making an election under Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). A copy of the Revenue Procedure can be found here: [http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-12-29.pdf].

Background: Taxation of Restricted Property Under Section 83 of the Code
Stated generally, Section 83(a) of the Code provides that if property is transferred to a service provider in connection with the performance of services, that service provider must report as gross income the excess of the property's fair value over the amount paid for such property in the taxable year when the property first (i) becomes transferable, or (ii) is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture, whichever occurs earlier.

Under Section 83, a substantial risk of forfeiture may be established only through a service condition or a condition related to the purpose of the transfer of the property. Whether a substantial risk of forfeiture exists depends on facts and circumstances. Both the likelihood that the forfeiture event will occur and the likelihood that the forfeiture will be enforced must be considered. The IRS recently proposed regulations to this effect on May 29, 2012, and found here: [http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-05-30/pdf/2012-12855.pdf]. A common example of when property is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture is when the property may be repurchased by the Company at the lower of the fair market value at the repurchase date or the original purchase price upon the service provider's termination of service. The lapse of this substantial risk of forfeiture is often referred to as "vesting."

In contrast to the default taxation at the time of vesting in Section 83(a), Section 83(b) permits the service provider to elect to include in gross income the excess of the property's fair value over the amount paid for such property at the time of transfer. To make this election, the service provider must file an election under Section 83(b) of the Code (an "83(b) Election") no later than 30 days after the transfer of the property with the IRS office where such person files his or her tax return. If an 83(b) Election has been properly made, any appreciation in the property's value is not taxable as compensation to the service provider upon vesting.

The following examples illustrate the alternatives set forth above. Taxpayer A purchases 25,000 shares of unvested stock from his employer on April 1, 2012 for $25,000 (the fair value of such stock on such date). The stock vests on April 1, 2014, when the stock is worth $40,000, and A sells the stock on April 1, 2015 for $60,000.

Event Amount Subject to Tax without 83(b) Election Amount Subject to Tax with 83(b) Election
2012 (purchase)
FMV: $25,000
$0 taxable income
(no taxation upon transfer of unvested property)
$0 taxable income
($25,000 fair value - $25,000 paid for property)
2014 (vesting)
FMV: $40,000
$15,000 in ordinary income upon vesting
($40,000 fair value - $25,000 paid for property)
$0 taxable income
(no taxation upon vesting, since taxation was elected upon transfer instead, pursuant to the 83(b) Election).
2015 (sale)
Sale Price: $60,000
$20,000 in capital gain
($60,000 amount realized - $25,000 amount paid - $15,000 included as ordinary income)
$35,000 in capital gain
($60,000 amount realized - $25,000 paid for property)

However, if a service provider has made an 83(b) Election and forfeits the property while it is unvested (i.e. because his or her service is terminated and the Company repurchases the unvested property at cost), no deduction shall be allowed for such forfeiture. The following examples illustrate this concept:

Taxpayer A receives, but does not pay for, 25,000 shares of unvested stock from his employer on April 1, 2012, when the value of such shares is $25,000. The shares vest on April 1, 2014, but the taxpayer's service is terminated in 2013, when the property remains unvested and is forfeited to his employer without payment.

Event Amount Subject to Tax without 83(b) Election Amount Subject to Tax with 83(b) Election
2012 (receipt without payment)
FMV: $25,000
$0 taxable income
(no taxation upon transfer of unvested property)
$25,000 ordinary income
($25,000 fair value - $0 paid for property)
2013 (forfeiture without payment) $0 taxable income $0 taxable income, and no deduction for taxes paid for 2012

The IRS Suggested Form 83(b) Election
An 83(b) Election must include the following: (i) a signature of the service provider making the election, (ii) a statement that the election is made under Section 83(b) of the Code, (iii) the service provider's name, address, and taxpayer identification number, (iv) a description of the property with respect to which the election is being made, (v) the date on which the property was transferred and the taxable year in which the election is made, (vi) the nature of the restrictions to which the property is subject, (vii) the fair market value of the property at the time of transfer, (viii) the amount paid for such property, and (ix) a statement that a copy of the election has been furnished to the person for whom the services were performed.

In Revenue Procedure 2012-29, the IRS provided a sample 83(b) Election, as referenced here: [http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-12-29.pdf]. However, so long as the election contains all of the required information above, it does not need to use the exact format or language of this sample. ​